There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Ian Duncan’s explanation that the mare had improved for the application of first time cheekpieces, was noted.
must be the greatest improvement ever for the application of cheekpieces.
3 qualifying runs - 125/1 beaten 41 lengths, 200/1 beaten 64 lengths, 100/1 tailed off pulled up.
sticks cheeckpieces on, doesn't just win. bolts up - kept on well run-in, easily
(Ring price: 33/1 40/1 66/1 50/1 66/1 50/1 66/1 50/1 66/1 50/1 66/1 50/1 40/1 50/1 40/1) SP 40/1
must be the greatest improvement ever for the application of cheekpieces.
3 qualifying runs - 125/1 beaten 41 lengths, 200/1 beaten 64 lengths, 100/1 tailed off pulled up.
sticks cheeckpieces on, doesn't just win. bolts up - kept on well run-in, easily
(Ring price: 33/1 40/1 66/1 50/1 66/1 50/1 66/1 50/1 66/1 50/1 66/1 50/1 40/1 50/1 40/1) SP 40/1
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 6
|
By:
knott reely a plunge in fairness..
|
|
By:
He had no alternative but to claim the improvement on cheekpieces as the first time in a handicap claim would be digging a hole to invite even more questions , nicely bottom weight as well.
As i always say the horse was essentially making its racecourse debut as its previous career was run on a different planet.  |
|
By:
does make you wonder. it's absolutely bolted up, couple of stone in hand job.
and yet it appears nobody had a clue. |
|
By:
66/1 >> 40/1 would be someone having a speculative £2.50 each-way on it.
was over 80's here. |
|
By:
hulk23 20 Jan 25 16:50
does make you wonder. it's absolutely bolted up, couple of stone in hand job. and yet it appears nobody had a clue. happens regularly. |
|
By:
I've been involved in " SP knock out jobs " Hulk they're pretty simple to operate as long as people keep their mouths shut , far better than giving the game away at a huge price for peanuts then winning at single digits.
|