Going through old papers this morning came across a 1987 edition of 'Winning Ways to Bet' by Methodmaker published by Raceform. Reading through it came across a very comprehensive article highlighting 'The VDW Approach to Betting'. Does any Betfairian use this method in their own betting today? Seems a logical way of going about things. Best wishes to all for the coming days.
I can't believe it was ever profitable to begin with. The gist is that "horses that have won under the current conditions are good horses to back, CD winners are better than non-CD winners". How can there be value in something so obvious?
I can't believe it was ever profitable to begin with. The gist is that "horses that have won under the current conditions are good horses to back, CD winners are better than non-CD winners". How can there be value in something so obvious?
It's not a system, but a 'method' to allow you to make your own selections - the full version is actually fairly complicated.
Personally wouldn't bother as lot of it is general analysis that most would be doing anyway.
It's not a system, but a 'method' to allow you to make your own selections - the full version is actually fairly complicated.Personally wouldn't bother as lot of it is general analysis that most would be doing anyway.
Being of an age, 58 i used to get racing chronicle and then raceform update, weekly in late 1980s, both excellent publications. VDW was all the rage then and made tony peach famous in his own right.
The method is easy in its initial approach, just awarding points for wins, d wins and cd wins. However there is still a big mystery from thw winning examples given.
I think the best words of advice were to watch a horse that seemed to improve when upped in grade for previous race which was now dropped back in grade in its own winning class
Being of an age, 58 i used to get racing chronicle and then raceform update, weekly in late 1980s, both excellent publications. VDW was all the rage then and made tony peach famous in his own right.The method is easy in its initial approach, just awa