|
By:
https://www.racingpost.com/bloodstock/news/international/the-aim-is-to-found-a-proper-spanish-stallion-line-noozhoh-canarias-proving-champion-material-once-again-a6ELh8c7018T/
|
|
By:
What is the issue with the headline? How would you write it?
|
|
By:
I see it now, as it reads like it should be 'find', but found as in to begin or originate.
So it won't be making the RP bloopers thread! |
|
By:
"The aim is to the founding father of a proper Spanish stallion line"
Does that sound better, Sam? |
|
By:
Found, as in to build a structure..
|
|
By:
found verb establish an institution or organization
|
|
By:
Find should be used instead of found.
|
|
By:
The use of the English grammar is correct Somerset, they already have the stallion so seeking to establish him and no need to "find" him!!
|
|
By:
They may indeed have the stallion but they are looking to "find" the stallion line.
|
|
By:
to found, from Latin fundare, same root as fundamental or foundation;
to find, from German finden, completely different word. Well done to the work experience junior for picking the correct one for a foundation stallion. |
|
By:
They are looking to "Found" the stallion line i.e establish one is what the grammar properly states. Nowhere does it say or suggest they are out looking for a stallion or did I miss something? Nothing better to correct the English language tbf than having non English speakers point out how nonsensical it is!!!
|
|
By:
Sam should have studied harder at school.
|
|
By:
Not a particularly great headline but not grammatically wrong as Sam seemed to find lol.
|
|
By:
Tbf to Sam, I spent my formative Latin lessons talking about golf, fishing and the Latin Masters time as a Policeman in Palestine!!
|
|
By:
And tbf to Mr Peacock, the 'specialist writer of the year', he's quoting Jose Hormaeche, who presumably isn't speaking in his native language.
I think an English person might have said 'establish' rather than 'found' in this context, but then again if he sees himself as a modern day Federico Tesio, then 'found' would be the correct word to use? |
|
By:
A dig at foreigners George? Does it say established sires for the Godolphin or Byerley Turk et al since the stud book started or does the use of Foundation sound more likely? So who is correct IYO in terms of the stud book, modern English or the accused RP teaboy?
|
|
By:
CagliariG, he's had a couple of jars of the devil's water and now he's up for a 'fight', as is his wont on the evening on the Betfair forum.
There was no 'dig at foreigners', my post concerned only semantics. |
|
By:
My only point is that the RP lad was correct in his use of grammar and words in relation to his subject, more kudos btw if he was translating from a respondent speaking his non native language. Who has had the devils water and spoiling for a fight IYO, Sam or Mac?
Wrong in both imvho? |
|
By:
Just read a few posts again George and would ask what price do you make yourself for Dipstick post of the year having been 66/1?
|
|
By:
999-1
|
|
By:
You've been put in at 1.01 for the award. Congratulations.
|
|
By:
Mitolo went 1/2 on Jan 1st but bar the conspiracy stuff I would have had you 66/1 just because it is traditional. If your post about drinking and the evening fight on here was directed at me you are now 6/4, might go 7'4 if you can provide any facts or evidence?
|
|
By:
Crossed your subtle and ignorant post, you are no offers, seems Mitolo was on the money, sad!!
|
|
By:
Have you FOUND or did you find anything on You choob yet George showing me drinking and being on here fighting since Jan 1st or anything from me slagging you for being a tinfoil hat wearing fruitcake?
No offers the answer is no but no offers plenty of of others exposing you? |