What does this mean, next o odds, Lengthen your odds Over 1? 5.00 Dundalk Eclairage Win odds 8/15, next to it 11/10 and Ohmyvietter Win odds 7/2, next to it 9/1. Does it mean to win by over a length?
So from your example Leif, where is the to win by 1 length and under option which in this case would be around 9/2? Surely that should be an option too?
So from your example Leif, where is the to win by 1 length and under option which in this case would be around 9/2? Surely that should be an option too?
If you bet Team A (-3) to beat Team B in a rugger game and team A won by just 2 points, but you weren't offered Team A (-1) as an option, would you feel aggrieved?
Don't follow your logic to be honest.If you bet Team A (-3) to beat Team B in a rugger game and team A won by just 2 points, but you weren't offered Team A (-1) as an option, would you feel aggrieved?
In the Rugby game I would have the option of backing Team B with a start or a handicap draw, i.e. ALL OPTIONS are covered. In addition there are many alternative handicap markets available.
In WH's lengthen your odds, NOT ALL OPTIONS are covered, as there is no 1 length and under available.
I'm sure if the 9/2 I quoted was available there would be plenty takers or is it WH just trying to hide the poor value this bet offers by not showing all the distance possibilities?
In the Rugby game I would have the option of backing Team B with a start or a handicap draw, i.e. ALL OPTIONS are covered. In addition there are many alternative handicap markets available.In WH's lengthen your odds, NOT ALL OPTIONS are covered, as t
Betting the nag to win by a length or under wouldn't be 9/2 though surely.
A hoss to win by a length or less over the bare minimum trip would be the most likely range given the proclevity of jocks to win cosiloy, comfortably on the snaff etc but rarely do they go overboard.
Betting the nag to win by a length or under wouldn't be 9/2 though surely.A hoss to win by a length or less over the bare minimum trip would be the most likely range given the proclevity of jocks to win cosiloy, comfortably on the snaff etc but rarel
Yeah it SHOULD be 9/2, which means the bookmaker is laying the horse (to win the race) at a slightly shorter price than 2/5, 3/8 in this example, but if offered I think we all know WH would only be 3/1 at best (making the horse to win a 1/4 chance).
As we know, these exotics are only out there to increase bookmaker profits, they are offered at massive overrounds, and I'm sure they don't appeal to many who are clued up.
The easiest way to explain this blatant exploitation is that if a horse was 1/1 to win a race then, for example, it should be 3/1 to win by "up to and including X lengths" and 3/1 "to win by over X lengths" (as 2 x 3/1 shots is equivalent to an 1/1 chance), but the bookmakers will bet both options at 2/1, hence making the 1/1 shot a 1/2 chance which subsequently increases their profit margin.
All I would want to see is all options offered by WH as currently you can only bet the horse to win or to win by options of over 1 length, so their current distance market is not a complete book.
I'm still a non player though!
Yeah it SHOULD be 9/2, which means the bookmaker is laying the horse (to win the race) at a slightly shorter price than 2/5, 3/8 in this example, but if offered I think we all know WH would only be 3/1 at best (making the horse to win a 1/4 chance).A