|
By:
3rd was going to win until the double drift
|
|
By:
cud be disq..need to sea hd on again.
|
|
By:
ATR will show head on after the stewards inquiry has finished
![]() |
|
By:
Depends if the stewarts were in on the gambol.
|
|
By:
Looks a straightforward toss to me.
|
|
By:
certain to go
|
|
By:
absolute cert to be chucked on that head on
|
|
By:
Lots of interference and will probably be chucked, but at 5.0 to stand I've had a very small tickle.
|
|
By:
Has to go. In at 1.28
|
|
By:
1.01 to be disq..wonderful price
|
|
By:
1.14 now. What price did you bag?
|
|
By:
How is this taking so long
|
|
By:
only caveat is..would 2nd have definetely have won? im dont honestly think it would have but,winners carried it 6-7yds right and bumped it 2-3 times.
|
|
By:
Its such a small 'but', we cant know that as its such significant interference
|
|
By:
They've declared dividends on RP website- they only Usually do this after result confIrmed.
|
|
By:
I often think when its taking a while to work out that they're only discussing jockey ban & they're not overturning
|
|
By:
stands
![]() |
|
By:
Standard farce from out stewards. This would have been sorted in 5-8 mins in the US. 24 mins and counting here.
|
|
By:
FFS
|
|
By:
wow, that's a big decision
|
|
By:
Stands - stewards a scorrupt as you can get.
|
|
By:
Seems like an obvious one to change on appeal.
|
|
By:
wd jamee good call
|
|
By:
That was 1.01 to be thrown out - how the hell can that happen.
|
|
By:
One can never know what goes on in the human brain as mentioned at 13.36.
|
|
By:
Worst decision I've seen for a while. Sure to get it if they appeal but too late for punters.
|
|
By:
There need to be financial repurcussions for stewards who blatantly make the wrong decision.
|
|
By:
i got lucky..more i watched i thort this wouldnt have won..it wasnt really coming to win the race..had more back on winner than i thort and actually won £200 but still was the wrong decision imo.
|
|
By:
the 1.01 backers only have to agree with the stewards the next 99 times out of 99 to recover
|
|
By:
only went 1.06..
even though i dont think it would have won you simply have to decide..has a horse being carried 6-7yds right and bumped 2-3 times cost it a neck? it was gradually closing last few yds but im not 'certain' it would have 100% won. |
|
By:
well worth an appeal that's for sure
|
|
By:
Horse Racing > Lingfield 3rd Dec : 1m2f Hcap
Showing 1 - 6 of 6 selections Selection Odds Stake (£) Bid type Placed Profit/Loss (£) Sunset In Paris *65.69 7.66 Lay 03-Dec-24 13:32 7.66 Harlington *71.02 4.27 Lay 03-Dec-24 13:32 4.27 Forge Valley Lad 1000 0.96 Lay 03-Dec-24 13:32 0.96 Lost In Time *1.20 1,000.00 Back 03-Dec-24 13:38 -1,000.00 Lost In Time *1.20 1,000.00 Lay 03-Dec-24 13:48 1,000.00 Dubai Harbour 5.20 45.95 Back 03-Dec-24 13:48 192.98 *Average odds: On Off Back subtotal: -807.02 Lay subtotal: 1,012.89 Market subtotal: 205.87 Commission @ 2.00%: 4.12 Net Market Total: 201.75 c'mon jamee post yours. |
|
By:
After rewatching i think the third would have won if not hampered
|
|
By:
c'mon jamee post yours.
|
|
By:
You're an odd fella, Rico.
Horse Racing > Lingfield 3rd Dec : 1m2f Hcap Showing 1 - 3 of 3 selections Selection Odds Stake (£) Bid type Placed Profit/Loss (£) Global Resolve *966.67 0.39 Lay 03-Dec-24 13:32 0.39 Mapogo 1000 0.70 Lay 03-Dec-24 13:32 0.70 Dubai Harbour 5 20.00 Back 03-Dec-24 13:36 80.00 *Average odds: On Off Back subtotal: 80.00 Lay subtotal: 1.09 Market subtotal: 81.09 Commission @ 2.00%: 1.62 Net Market Total: 79.47 |
|
By:
Well its going to take me plenty of work to get that back
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
£1.09 without the stewards bet jamee..all adds up i suppose.
|
|
By:
tramps on park benches suddenly seen holding on to their bag of chips with a vice like grip as some Betfair 1.1 backers circle menacingly around them
![]() |