|
By:
inq called
|
|
By:
3 small nudges..did it affect the result? not imo
1.7 looked a wonderful price. |
|
By:
i agree but i don't trust them
|
|
By:
only seen normal view but cud you say 2nd wud have won ...don't think so
|
|
By:
they could argue continued interference / intimidation and whilst i think best horse won they are not always consistent, don't think 2nd would have got up but i will leave, gl rico
|
|
By:
I think if you changed the jockeys you change the result, I thought Woods was better on the winner
|
|
By:
im +£75 or +£5
|
|
By:
stewards don't always go by the rules. See plenty of intimidation and a little nudge or two and they don't care whether winner is always holding 2nd
|
|
By:
i think the result is known lol
|
|
By:
went 1.03
|
|
By:
aye, that wasn't a secret
|
|
By:
Suspend man must have feel a kip..
|
|
By:
correct decision
|
|
By:
How strange i wonder what can cause this ?
|
|
By:
* fell a kip
|
|
By:
Christmas??
|
|
By:
Stewards Enquiry - Result Stands
wd rico..still best ever in the forum. |
|
By:
MELISH fancied the 2nd on the back of Freddie Gordon taking 5 off instead of NICO riding, sign of times when gold cup winning jockey,stable jock of one of countries top yds isn't considered worth 5lbs
|