There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
can anyone explain why it was only 11.3%. was always a strong fav.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 11
|
By:
Non runner Oslo (GB) Fiercely Proud was withdrawn not under orders. Rule 4 does not apply.
|
|
By:
https://www.irishracing.com/raceresults/Fri-25th-Oct-2024/Cheltenham/1645
|
|
By:
it was a shortish priced fav. rule 4 definitely applied to bets before a new market was formed
|
|
By:
seems very odd
|
|
By:
did it drift a lot when it was loose?
|
|
By:
NR:
Fiercely Proud (withdrawn, by order of stewards, unseated jockey and loose before start), Oslo (self certificate) R4: Fiercely Proud was withdrawn. Price at time of withdrawal 5/2. Rule 4 applies to bets struck prior to withdrawal but not to SP bets - deduction 25p in the Pound. New market formed. Distances: ¾l, 3¼l, 1¼l Time: 3m 55.27s (slow by 6.27s) Unplaced Fav: Jilaijone 3/1J Total SP: 117% |
|
By:
thats incredibly benign. usually red factors are brutal
|
|
By:
even worse in places markets, laughably small reductions
|
|
By:
I'd def question it if I layed the winner
|
|
By:
Looks negligent. Strong claim - betfair will do it on a case-by-case basis (subtext: don't ask, don't get).
|
|
By:
It drifted when it was loose from 2/1 to 4/1 (approximately) but the reduction factor was already set. Just seems very odd it was set at such a low factor. It had been 2/1 or under since the market formed until it bolted as far as I know
|