Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
1st time poster
19 Oct 24 10:16
Joined:
Date Joined: 25 Dec 05
| Topic/replies: 55,822 | Blogger: 1st time poster's blog
losing the FOOKING room,room full of racing fans ,quite a feat

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 23
By:
1st time poster
When: 19 Oct 24 10:19
3 of them discussing whip disq and not one of them mentioning losing punters, me ,me m,e, us,us,us, our job on TV, blah,blah
By:
Pilsudski
When: 19 Oct 24 10:19
Ludicrous “interview”.
By:
1st time poster
When: 19 Oct 24 10:21
everything that's wrong with the sports encapsulated in 5 mins,biggest story to happen to pun ters in 2 yrs and the 3 of them having a bedwetting session on how it effects them their jobs not a single mention of punters
By:
Facts
When: 19 Oct 24 10:24
Absolutely ! No mention of how to avoid repeat of the Cesaerwitch debacle.
By:
1st time poster
When: 19 Oct 24 10:24
if its to mentally challenging to count to 6 and then 10 and impossible to stop anywhere between 6 and 10 ,go do something FOOKING else,6 of top 10 jocks no bans,2 in a 250,000 group one and a kid landing a top handicap for a wizard layim ng one out who,s currently warned of for cheating, JOIN THE FOOKING DOTS
By:
CROPSICK
When: 19 Oct 24 10:25
Too right, punters never got paid but they alsp LOST there fkng stake.
By:
CROPSICK
When: 19 Oct 24 10:26
Chapman had the chance to Question on the day disqual and blew it, if they can do it in France are we so inept we cant do it over here.
By:
Facts
When: 19 Oct 24 10:32
Agreed. All those connected with Manxman deservedly benefited from its promotion to winner of the race.
All except those who backed it to win !!!
Utter nonsensical situation.
By:
CagliariG
When: 19 Oct 24 10:39
Of course it could be done in the UK but nothing would change in terms of paying out punters, as stated previously, disqualifying one on the day which may then be re-instated following the whip review committee still leaves one group of punters disgruntled. The only possible solution would be for the bookies to withhold payment until the whip review was completed and pay out on the result they arrive at and that is never going to happen.

Little different to expecting the same from drug disqualifications, just not going to happen and whatever method was used the result for one set of punters would be the same.
By:
1st time poster
When: 19 Oct 24 10:42
why would ONE be reinstated we just advertise/employ stewards who can count to 10,and tell morons like Kevin Blake,Tony Martin,ITV who have spent a week searching for loopholes   etc to get out of the FOOKING game
By:
CagliariG
When: 19 Oct 24 10:46
You need to learn the rules before ranting about those that do 1st TP!!
By:
Eddie Batt
When: 19 Oct 24 10:54
I can't believe there are people still whinging about not getting paid out on the second -grow up lads.Result on the day is what counts-end of story.
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Oct 24 10:56
wel sed ed..we nah the dance.
By:
Facts
When: 19 Oct 24 11:03
Stewards on the day already  announce enquiry immediately post race and object to the winner regarding rule infringement ( ie crossing, bumping ) exp if winning margin is minimal.

Absolutely no reason why same can't be applied to a jockey using 10 strikes with the whip. The world and his wife could see this on the first repplay of the finish from the 2f pole.
Race should should have been awarded to Manxman, before weighed in announcement.
By:
Facts
When: 19 Oct 24 11:10
Eddie Batt.

Not a case of whinging !!

More a case of consistency.

Most bookenow pay out on 1st past the post and amended result, this decision is made immediately after the race following a stewards enquiry/ objection.
Same should be applied to whip ruling
By:
CagliariG
When: 19 Oct 24 11:12
You also need to learn the rules as they stand Facts, not cut and dried on the day as things stand.
By:
Facts
When: 19 Oct 24 11:18
The rules are clear. Use 10 strikes of the whip = disqualification.

It's the decision that such an infringement can only be convinced by a separate committee - days after the race.

That's the ludicrous issue at stake here !
By:
CagliariG
When: 19 Oct 24 11:22
Btw almost guaranteed that had they finished with the result the other way around there would have been less howling as the Irish horse was a relative outsider and btw I backed the 2nd ew and no complaints about either ride from apprentices even if not agreeing with the whip rules in the first place.
By:
CagliariG
When: 19 Oct 24 11:25
Just proves you are moaning because you don't know the rules Facts, had the review committee found that even one of the perceived strikes did not make contact of was used for safety reasons the disqualification question goes away!!! hth
By:
1st time poster
When: 19 Oct 24 11:39
was no  safety issue and even if one had missed the raising of the arm coming down with the whip counts as a hit even if missing
By:
CagliariG
When: 19 Oct 24 11:47
LOL 1st TP!!
By:
1st time poster
When: 19 Oct 24 11:51
if oily bel,l and ITV don't like or want to highlight whip issues on TV they must be preying TIFFANY isn't involved in a close finish today at ASCOT Devil
By:
Facts
When: 19 Oct 24 12:45
CagliariG

Now you bring up a hypothetical position ?!
Fact - 10 strikes - proved. Disqualified.I

This decision scenario could have occurred immediately post race by the Stewards.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com