Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Rico-Dangleflaps
19 Sep 24 16:53
Joined:
Date Joined: 07 Sep 18
| Topic/replies: 40,075 | Blogger: Rico-Dangleflaps's blog
Mischief

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 18
By:
howard
When: 19 Sep 24 16:54
cert be be changed or the stewards should resign
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Sep 24 16:54
winer gave 2nd hefty bmp 100yds out..won inches has to go.
By:
howard
When: 19 Sep 24 16:58
free money if you've the bottle....I could only play these with centralised  pro stewards
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Sep 24 16:59
but its give 2nd ahefty bump knocking it sideways..won 2"..how can you make a case to stand?
By:
howard
When: 19 Sep 24 17:01
you can't
By:
howard
When: 19 Sep 24 17:06
1.01     £17,500.45
1.02            £26,170.78       
1.03            £30,581.39       
1.04            £10,016.46       
1.05            £4,628.04       
1.06            £13,602.98
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Sep 24 17:09
crazy..
By:
jamee1
When: 19 Sep 24 17:11
revised
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Sep 24 17:11
winner disq

20 mins shud have been 5.
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Sep 24 17:15
biggest gubbing ive scene for a long time that..
By:
howard
When: 19 Sep 24 17:16
win much ?
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Sep 24 17:17
250/750
By:
howard
When: 19 Sep 24 17:24
only if the stewards were trainees from Rampton could that one be unchanged
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Sep 24 17:47
eye conquer..but,they cant be trusted as taking 20 mins shows.
By:
oneten
When: 19 Sep 24 18:17
I would argue it should keep the race (as I backed the original winner). From memory they bumped and the haggas horse recovered enough to go into the lead before being nailed by the fav.

It had plenty of time to get over being bumped and recovered enough to go into the lead. On that evidence the bump was inconsequential as the better horse won.

However, had I backed the 2nd I would have argued it had cost it the race, but in all honesty I don't think it did .
By:
howard
When: 19 Sep 24 19:00
It doesn't work like that oneten. If you've been bumped and beaten two inches it's clear you would have won without it.
By:
swiftynifty
When: 19 Sep 24 19:06
I've never bought that 'he had time to recover argument', he wouldn't have needed to recover without the foul.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 19 Sep 24 19:08
I felt the original winner lost more from the bump and being straightened by jockey than
the second, but the bump cost the second far more than 2 inches and
the winner lugged across causing the bump.

The winner was the best horse, imo, but youve
shirley got to disqualify it for causing the interference
as you can only make allowance for bumped horse and
not the one doing the bumping.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com