Bellewstown stewards

nice NOT to show the head on

They did show the final 20 yards

2nd would probably have got up but not definitely.

Ffs get the tweezers..@sre full of spelks..

i couldn't decide and will leave it

I've loaded at 1.5 average on the FPTP.  Will keep it in my opinion

money seems confident

Aug 27, 2024 -- 7:59PM, Rico-Dangleflaps wrote:

2nd would probably have got up but not definitely.Ffs get the tweezers..@sre full of spelks..

Value in the 1.5 to keep IMO.

Hope it goes though. I managed to lay a big chunk on the fptp at 1.01. Have greened up some. A bit of excitement for the last race

value @1.5 but 2nd would probably have got up?

Exactly. The second would "probably have got up but not definitely". Ergo, stewards more likely to keep.

1.01 wasnt value then lol

4k done at 1.01..most of witch was in the pink side and jamee laid it?  abso pi$$ing my pants.

walofs

Matched bets
Order by matched date
Back (Bet For)
Odds
Stake
Profit
Royal Eagle
1.45
£400.00
£180.00
Total stake:
£400.00
Lay (Bet Against)
Backer's odds
Backer's stake
Payout
Liability
Royal Eagle
1.01
£1,020.00
£10.20
Total stake:
£1,020.00

Revised!

Reversed

19:45 Bellewstown
Race Card
1
Horse silk
13
Walking On Glass (IRE)
8/1
2
Horse silk
7
Royal Eagle (IRE)
4/1
3
Horse silk
11
Barrier (FR)
9/1

Stewards Enquiry - Amended Result

jamee1 27 Aug 24 19:57 
Value in the 1.5 to keep IMO.

pmsl..worst in forum bar non.

The longer it went on the more it looked risky for the FPTP

WD layers of the FPTP

steve u said u'd loaded up so you're not one to talk

bar non

im glad i left that if id been after a quick kill id prob have gone with stands

bar non

Wazza cashed out for a profit ... Nap

just watched it..harsh decision imo..2nd lost very little in momentum  imo (aint seen head on)

wazza jacks in at 6 reg..

unlucky happens

The Raceday Stewards enquired into possible interference in the closing stages involving Royal Eagle, ridden by Mr A.J. Lord, placed first, and Walking On Glass, ridden by Miss A.B. O'Connor, placed second, where it appeared Walking On Glass had to switch. Evidence was heard from the riders concerned. Miss A.B. O'Connor stated that her racing line was taken and she lost 3 lengths as a result of the interference. She also believed that she was on the best horse and would have won with a clear run. Mr. A. J. Lord stated that he was clear when he moved to the rail. Having viewed the recording of the race and considered the evidence, the Raceday Stewards were of the opinion that Royal Eagle had caused interference to Walking On Glass in that he did improve his finishing position as a result of this interference so they reversed the placing's of the first and second horses

3 lengths pmsl..lost little in the way of momentum (imo) got going really late..did it cost it more than a nck?

debateable.

Good to be reminded that these decisions are in the lap of the gods - or even the godly. Personally I do not see why the stewards cannot award a dead heat - given the fact that no one can be sure who would have won and then at least the respcctive owners / connections would not be total losers.

'Ungodly' not godly!

As they say - 'one man's bummer is another's sweet arse'

yes..jammee & gaze.