By:
ditto
|
By:
spot on SS. A disgrace. And yet there is a field of 25+ in the sales races when half of them are 66/1+ and couldn't place if they started 2 minutes b4 the rest. As a small syndicate owner (not qualified for this race my horse) I would be livid. Especially if it was a filly!
|
By:
Forecast going was good/firm but we have had some rain overnight here in Somerset about 30 miles away. It is another nail in the coffin of pattern races at Salisbury though.
|
By:
So a runner could be 3rd by 30 lengths and get black type! (and pick up £4304 for the exercise!).
|
By:
Also 6 races only. If they ran a 6 race card anywhere else on the planet no one would show up!
|
By:
I'm watching but keeping my Betting bank ready for York
|
By:
Easy solution. Less horse racing which would give less opportunities and therefore increased field sizes
|
By:
Interesting little race nonetheless.
Maybe the outsider of three? |
By:
Celtic warrior 14 Aug 24 13:42
Easy solution. Less horse racing which would give less opportunities and therefore increased field sizes Bookmakers would love it. |
By:
the media keep saying horseracing is on its last legs, yet a forty grand race attracts only 3 runners.There are plenty of horses rated 60 and under that
their ownwers are happy to pay to keep in training. Plenty of horses are being bought for over 200k ! The one area I think money leaves the game is the sales arena. I woder how much Goffs,et al are taking out of the game . |
By:
Too right, blunder. About time there was a redistribution of prize money in our sport.
|
By:
Agree barstool - still an interesting race, as market is showing with uncertainty - I'm laying favourite, just on value as both others could be very decent.
|
By:
Blunder, how do you work out that the sales are taking money out of the game? The vendors/ breeders benefit and the purchasers then contribute via training fees etc so the sales actually generate income for the sport regardless of any profit they make.
|
By:
|
By:
Parthenon for me. I wonder why he's not odds-on with Moore onboard too.
|
By:
Same for me Imp....g/l
|
By:
Clearly Luther cannot win this horse race.
|
By:
g/l indeed. We'll know in a few minutes.
|
By:
New Century for me here.
|
By:
Boom.
|
By:
Could not be more wrong. The slow boat traded at 1.5 but finished very last of 3. What a wasted trip?
|
By:
I'm laying favourite, just on value as both others could be very decent.
|
By:
1.28 Luther
|
By:
The O'Brien dog looked a horrible thing, head high, tail all over the place
|
By:
Well done backers. Thank-goodness the jolly was not a price boost. It'd have been more painful, if so.
|
By:
Money following reputation again. Coolmore, O'Brien, colours so must be a Group horse. But the winner had the form in the book. Sea of Roses for the double in an hour.
|
By:
3rd surely needs deep ground?
|
By:
Sage, I always think you need to respect the Balding stable at Salisbury right back to a certain Mill Reef making his debut here.
|
By:
Very true, sparrow.
|
By:
Very true, sparrow.
|
By:
Trident you could be right but why do you think he needs an excuse? He might just be well behind the other 2 in ability. Sparrow, Salisbury has always been the Balding back yard. Ian was a director there once he handed over the training and I remember Passing Glance winning a Group race there as well as many other stable stars. Jeff Smith is also a director and if Balding and Smith have a runner there, look out. Today might not be outstanding form as Luther was closing all the way.
|
By:
Not one of Oisin's best rides. How on earth did he expect to win from last place?
|