Agree with leif. The one "sport" I would never pay to watch or even watch for free. Not very different from cockfighting and badger baiting in my mind.
Agree with leif. The one "sport" I would never pay to watch or even watch for free. Not very different from cockfighting and badger baiting in my mind.
I'm with Leif and Sage , the sport takes corrupt to another level.
To me boxing has zero entertainment level.
If forced to predict would have to side with corruption and go for the draw.
I'm with Leif and Sage , the sport takes corrupt to another level.To me boxing has zero entertainment level.If forced to predict would have to side with corruption and go for the draw.
As I posted in another forum..........Having been brought up with great heavyweight champions from Rocky Marciano through to Lennox Lewis I can work up no interest in these great lumps of lard we seem to have now.
As I posted in another forum..........Having been brought up with great heavyweight champions from Rocky Marciano through to Lennox Lewis I can work up no interest in these great lumps of lard we seem to have now.
The logical reason for Fury winning is he's the best heavyweight of his generation and Usyk is a natural cruiserweight. Fury should win. That was my first assumption and the easy assumption. But, generational fighters like Mayweather and Alvarez continually fought their biggest challengers. Fury has spent a lifetime fighting bums, with only a couple of top opponents thrown in. Klitschko was 39 and never won another fight. Wilder got well beat by Parker last time out. Froch has called it out as it is. So we'll see. Generational talent in Usyk, or best of the current crop of heavyweights in Fury. Fury has also had a bad cut that may well open up again. Hopefully that won't ruin the fight.
The logical reason for Fury winning is he's the best heavyweight of his generation and Usyk is a natural cruiserweight. Fury should win. That was my first assumption and the easy assumption. But, generational fighters like Mayweather and Alvarez c