|
By:
good luck colonel
|
|
By:
Fanks, Foyle.
|
|
By:
That boring f ucking draw again. Take it into account and it will mock you; don't take it into account and it will mock you.
|
|
By:
How many extra yards did the jockey go there? Shocking ride in such a small field.
|
|
By:
Moore rode a good race. I do not think Arrest would have won had his jockey applied more jockey sense.
|
|
By:
No. That wasn't my point though.
|
|
By:
It was well beat. Wouldn`t have beaten the winner today on any track in the world.
|
|
By:
Jeez again I'll say that wasn't my point.
|
|
By:
MJK, you're dealing with people who backed the winner. They would say their horse was unbeatable, wouldn't they. Maybe he was but he didn't exactly make it look easy. I'm not a great jockey blamer, but he didn't seem to use the huge length of the race to Arrest's advantage given how important pace is at Chester.
|
|
By:
I never bet in the race. Anybody that thinks Arrest would have beaten the winner today with another jockey on board has been on the Buckfast. Best horse won easy.
|
|
By:
No one said he would have won. The finish might have been more exciting (something that racing is supposed to offer). The winner did not make it look easy; he was open to be shot at, but no one did.
|
|
By:
I get your point Colonel. Actually, having not had a bet and seen your thread, believe it or not, I was wanting Arrest to win for you! I can`t even say "unlucky" as imo it wouldn`t have won whatever way it had been ridden. Good luck with your next bets.
|
|
By:
I just had Tony Montana - why didn't I put him in the double!? Coz I is a c unt.
|
|
By:
It was well beat. Wouldn`t have beaten the winner today on any track in the world.
|