Stewards Down

they won't chuck our top chtr Cromwell - usual duck eggs before a win from that yard

Standard tactic these days . All wrong

had momentum could well have won..the ease up has made the winning distance 1.5L though.

im not backing the winner but i think it will stand

Think it might go,mullered the runner up.

he's getting some time off either way

Are the irish stewards KOSHER

Lay (Bet Against)
Backer's odds
Backer's stake
Payout
Liability
Tell Us This
1.20
£200.00
£240.49

not a 1/5 imo

if 2nd had been beaten less than a nck then 1.1 to go.

winner leaning in from last all the way up the run-in 2nd had nowhere to go in the end hence eased up
Ive backed the second so am a bit biased but it has to go surely...

ps no bet on stewards I always get these wrong!

Stone Walsh broke every rule in the book after the last.

taking their time and the prices have hoovered

result stands.

Game of opinions but I think the Stewards got that wrong,from the last hurdle to the line the jockey on the winner had a chance to correct his  hanging mount but didn't,in hindsight the heavy ease by the runner up jockey was a big mistake.

eye conquer..the 1.5L saved it.

it wouldn't have surprised me if they chucked it but it was more on balance as to how they normally go that i felt it may keep it

101 backer off the karzi.

May 6, 2024 -- 2:36PM, Rico-Dangleflaps wrote:

101 backer off the karzi.

Aye

deserved to lose that - still no great harm done except again jockeys getting away with unsafe riding and i stopped betting in running when i saw them so close or that could have proved very expensive

Basically condoning breaking the rules by letting that keep it imo,I've seen a lot less interference see FPTP turfed out,a real roll the dice job with the sherry drinkers.

Bad decision even Mr. Stevi Wonder could see that there was serious interference. I guess the second (Trainer ??) was a gamble so bookies saved again.

sadly it will take a serious accident before the rules are altered so they are in line with every other jurisdiction. the yuk and direland strangely resistant

there was talk of a re-drawing of the rules when shane foley wiped out the entire field at leop a couple of years ago but nothing happened. even aob said he should have been chucked and get a month ban

it drifted 2-3 yds right over half a fur..hardly a hanging offence..would it have won? mebbe,who knows...ive no doubt the 1.5L winning distance saved it.

Rider given 9-day holiday.

107B Club Lemon H'cap H'dle
The Raceday Stewards enquired into possible interference in the closing stages of this race involving Benjis Benefit, ridden by A.P. Kelly, placed second, and Tell Us This, ridden by C. Stone-Walsh, placed first, where it appeared interference may have occurred. Evidence was heard from the riders concerned. A.P. Kelly stated that Tell Us This was coming across to him the whole way to the line after jumping the last and that he shouted at C. Stone-Walsh numerous times. C. Stone-Walsh stated that his mount ran very green and when he jumped the last he thought he was clear to go to the rail. Having viewed the recording of the race and considered the evidence, the Raceday Stewards were of the opinion that while Tell Us This had caused interference to Benjis Benefit he did not improve his finishing position as a result of this interference so they made no alteration to the Judge’s placings. They were, however, of the opinion that C. Stone-Walsh was in breach of Rule 214, in that he had ridden improperly and having considered his record in this regard the Raceday Stewards suspended him for nine racedays.

the Raceday Stewards were of the opinion that while Tell Us This had caused interference to Benjis Benefit he did not improve his finishing position

fckn pmsl..so its come from 2L down to get withing a hd and closing then jockey had to snatch it up..

Think he was lucky to keep that race.Jockey had
his whip in the wrong hand aswell,not once did
he try to straighten him up.

correct penzy.

joke decision - farcical