There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Any takers?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 41
|
By:
Not my price pre-race but difficult to see him getting beat.
|
|
By:
Clinton Lane could outrun his monster odds again, won at 100/1 last time and doesn't have Maxwell up. GL
 |
|
By:
Can see this Fav winning by a huge margin. Even with the jockey on board!
|
|
By:
Good Luck all today, Dont mind abit of this tricky track myself!
|
|
By:
maxwell odds on & hexham mud
 |
|
By:
22/1 in the bookies for the win, can have 90's here.
in case you're wondering why they're all empty as .... |
|
By:
fill your boots @ 2/1 haslam e/w
|
|
By:
had to be opposed with Maxy up. wd winners
|
|
By:
hmm
|
|
By:
Maxwell never let's you down!
|
|
By:
Well you have to laugh really.
|
|
By:
Good ride from McLernon, letting the fav empty out.
|
|
By:
Jockey is pathetic but the usual will keep making excuses
|
|
By:
Has Maxwell ever ridden at Hexham before ?
|
|
By:
hulk23 22 Apr 24 14:06
had to be opposed with Maxy up. wd winners yes wd hulk..although tis easier post race.  |
|
By:
Just held on for second. I didn't bet in the race though t.b.h.
|
|
By:
Favourite well beaten but didn't see jockey doing too much wrong to be fair. Given the margin I doubt a proper jockey would have won on it.
|
|
By:
That bloke would get Arkle beat. But he buys the horses blah blah. Poor horses I say.
Nice fella though. How he earn his wealth? |
|
By:
I thought there was a rule that a horse should be running on its merits. When Maxwell is riding that is not the case.
The BHA should withdraw his licence. |
|
By:
All lumping on when he isn't riding it ?
|
|
By:
Nice ride from McLernon, just let Maxwell get on with it. Once he got back on terms it was all over.
Favourite well punted (albeit a bit of late support for the winner), but you have to wonder why. If it comes to anything like a close finish then Maxwell is a huge negative. |
|
By:
Property Developer
|
|
By:
Tbf the horse finds nothing recently.
|
|
By:
MJK 22 Apr 24 14:11
Getting a nice lead and kicks on so early with the hill to come. Yeah, great ride assumed you laid the odds on and bagged up? vwd. |
|
By:
opposing jocks have 2 bullets to fire
the horse getting legless or maxwell getting legless ,maxwell himself often doesnt get the trip you can he see his arm movements/pushing getting slower and slower, maxwell/pundits been telling all season this horse needs settling and putting in front on the line,maxwell obviously given up on that ,and said fook it kiuck on if i,m good enough i,ll win |
|
By:
yeah trident shouldn't really have been a problem with a horse that has won over further. That said when your main opponent is also a good stayer it didn't make total sense.
|
|
By:
"and doesn't have Maxwell up. "
"had to be opposed with Maxy up. wd winners" "yes wd hulk..although tis easier post race" made a cnt of yourself again Rico ? tut tut |
|
By:
maxwell trying to tell people in interview he,ll be a better jockey when he loses his claim because he,s struggling to do weight on novice hurdlers etc, as lian nielsom would say
GOOD LUCK SELLING THAT ARGUMENT |
|
By:
Bit of a head scratcher:ridden prominently in France and clearly stays further.Maybe head gear needs employing.Must have been very short in running?
|
|
By:
hulk23 22 Apr 24 14:23
made a cnt of yourself again Rico ? tut tut ewe tipped a horse that pulled up and post race said maxwell had to be opposed? |
|
By:
was 90/1 Rico. i can stick up a 1/750 winner like you do if you like.
be expecting everyone to thank me when it wins mind. |
|
By:
i'll put one up every day and hope everyone forgets about it when one wins.
rest of the time i'll look fkng amazing. |
|
By:
funny thing is he may not want very testing ground. I know he's won a couple of chases in France but they often say it's softer than it is. His win over here was on G/S. He goes quickly from hero to zero. It often suggests the going.
|
|
By:
ewe aftertimed the maxwell hoss but i made a cnt of myself? is that what you're saying?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Why would I care what you assume?
|
|
By:
sew,no lay? is this watt you're intimating?
|
|
By:
|