There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Not for me up in weights plus Cannon, who is not the best... Lay...
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 23
|
By:
Harry ?
|
|
By:
won't see a worse performance from a 2.33 shot all season.
out on it's feet half a mile out. |
|
By:
Wrong about the jockey ,but good shout on the lay .
|
|
By:
So who rode it or is it another quiz?
|
|
By:
Cobden
|
|
By:
Thank you.
|
|
By:
Really detest this course for jumpers, do favs ever win here? Seem to remember Cobden having a dire day here last time, looks like same story tdy and of course the outsider of 3 btn 28 lngths last time for Oily Murphy does in. So wish it had been off, Poxy dump.
|
|
By:
u don't like it there then?
|
|
By:
Detest it along with Fakenham. Aw there is fine, just jumps.
|
|
By:
The performance of GALWAY MAHLER (IRE), which started favourite and was pulled up, was considered. Karen Jewell’s explanation that the gelding was unsuited by the Going, which was officially described as Heavy, Soft in places and would prefer a quicker surface was noted, the Veterinary Officer examined GALWAY MAHLER (IRE) during routine testing and had nothing to report.
|
|
By:
Praying Fontwell will be on tmrw Hibby, Joe Cotton will be another for JS.
|
|
By:
Galway Mahler had won on heavy at Lingfield previously, don't the stewards immed look for that? Obv not.
|
|
By:
the stewards suffer from nodding dog syndrome doorman...
will look out for that one...  |
|
By:
The performance of HOSTILE HOTELIER (IRE), which was pulled up, was considered. The representative of Jennie Candlish's explanation that the gelding was unsuited by the Going, which was officially described as Heavy, Soft in places and would prefer a quicker surface was noted. The Veterinary Officer examined HOSTILE HOTELIER (IRE) during routine testing and had nothing to report.
|
|
By:
got form on Heavy ground from what i can tell.
|
|
By:
ground was bottomless the day it won at lingfield.
walk in there in tell the stewards it wasn't suited by the heavy going ?? can say anything you want basically. |
|
By:
JC - it wasn't suited by the heavy ground...
stewards - it's won on heavy ground... JC - yes i know but it hated it and it prefers faster ground... stewards - ok no probs...thanx Jen. |
|
By:
should have said...
stewards - ok no probs...thanx Jen...we're just going through the motions so that the mug public who helps fund the sport can't say we do nowt. |
|
By:
if she knew it was going to be unsuited by the Going, which was officially described as Heavy, Soft in places and she knew it would prefer a quicker surface
why did she run it ? |
|
By:
i agree entirely hulk...
it's a fkn farce tbh... just keeping up the charade that they are on top of things imv. |
|
By:
why did she run it at Lingfield on ground officially described as Heavy ? think that meeting was actually in jeopardy given the dire state of the ground. but she had no issues running it and watching it win.
|
|
By:
then comes out and says "yeah, clearly can't run on heavy can it ... "
 |
|
By:
as i say hulk...
total farce... just treating the public with utter contempt... as they always do. |