|
By:
Going is overrated, odds on favs win just as much at heavy going as on firm ground.
|
|
By:
Hi Fairweather hope you're well
![]() Two ways of coming at this one in both my view and experience , if it's shrewd to swerve backing presumably fancied horses on perceived bad ground then as an alternative why not look for double digit selections on that said ground and preferably the lower grade the better , the required strike rate for profit is far more attainable than most would think. Not meaning to be pedantic just wearing my lateral thinking cap ![]() |
|
By:
On decent form thanks Hayden, hope you're well too. I work on form and ideally need a few weeks of consistent ground in the book before I get too involved.
I always find this time of year a strange one - I tend to agree with Karl Burke in todays RP, why not move the Lincoln to the weekend before the Craven meeting, and cut out this 2 weeks of soft ground, low level rubbish.. |
|
By:
1st race 8/1, 150/1, 80/1.
2nd race 3 runners, outsider beats the 2nd fav beats the odds on fav. Looking forward to the marathon 3rd race, I wonder if anything will finish? Each to his own, Gaze.. |
|
By:
back the longshots and lay the favs if you think the ground makes favs lose then
|
|
By:
or jussed edit your p&l and change name to delusion.
|