racing tv charge me 29.98 for march

I have also been paying £18 and its up for renewal in May. I certainly won't be paying more for pictures behind BLV.

but what about listening to Dave Yates views sparrow ?

will your life be worth living without them ?

I like to listen to Rachel Candelora and used to like Fremantle but little else to be honest.

the bloke lives in the gutter.

Hayden, do you have a link for the 'firestick' option please?

About a year ago, I called them up saying I wanted to cancel it, they offered me 12 months at half price if I stayed (apparently that was what they were offering new customers at the time) so of course I accepted.

Must be nearly time for another phone call

Try Adultwork.

i pay 12.50 a month  1 year deal until august this year

*be aired

You could add the option for a premium subscription for those who want the free raceday tickets and access to tips and whatnot on their website and thrown in some other incentive's like a members tipping comp with decent prizes and so on.

Once upon a time I couldn't even imagine not having RUK, but playing I/R with LV now ahead of the channel, just don't need it.

Think that just depends on which browser you use Manoleeds.

You can get full screen with RUK pictures using Firefox and maybe others too.

if you are so granite you begrudge 20 quid a month give it up

and although you dont need it to play i/r its worth it for watching the paddock aided by, eg the m dixon fremantle neesom berry etc. its annoying to back something and then see it misbehaving. its smarter to wait until as late as poss because you dont know what will happen in the minutes before the off and without rtv you will be betting blind. that alone is worth the cost

and why would someone deny themselves the facility of playing i/r, even if they dont use it? there was a nag at navan a few weeks ago that went down at 100mph and chucked donohue off several times and was reluctantly lining up and it duly chucked him off before the tape went up. it shouldnt have been a runner but was. i laid it for a good few quid at 1.7 and got paid. any idiot could have done it and i did

so why not have the option? seems daft to me. that was unfair on its backers but a goldmine for those watching from home

effectively free money and there aint much of that around

I do uti;ize it, I have all the information on it that I need and nothing more, and I still think It's the best 5 quid I've ever spent, I could use everything else like you but I'd just be doing it for the sake of it.

One screen for everything does me OK.

if it works for you

just dont see how full screens arent better, particularly with big fields

Mitolo, missing the point as per. You obviously win at the game so you should have no probs stumping up the 30 quid.

But what about those pensioners, students and small stakes punters who make an acceptable loss but bet for the enjoyment and having an interest in a race. I'm sure they be happy to watch a no frills, free service and thus gives them a bit more stake money each month to play with. It's about looking at the bigger picture. Unfortunately, very much like a succession of UK Governments, those who run Horse Racing only think about the here and now.