|
By:
Odds of 1.66 currently available and £0.00 currently matched in the 2 place market, I assume all of that £0.00 is yours?
Why do megamugs start so many threads about pretendee bets? |
|
By:
I backed it in the win market becaue it's a cert.
|
|
By:
So your thread title and your opening post are just bollix?
|
|
By:
I'm not entering a market with a 20 tick gap like a mug.
|
|
By:
I'll wait for megamug layers to give me a good price before the off.
|
|
By:
Yeah. You claimed 1.50 for 2 places was free money.
You wouldn't wanna be taking 1.66 ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Why would I take 1.66 when I can take 1.8 when it drifts.
|
|
By:
Genuine 1.80 or pretendee 1.80?
|
|
By:
Gaze you need to contact the GC and become their poster boy for problem gamblers aka clueless idiots!! Btw TM he thinks 8/1 ew placed returns 2.6 at 1/5 the odds!!
|
|
By:
I think the 4 horse would be better value….yard in good form and the 7lb in favour…..
|
|
By:
yeah 7 lb with a useless jock, it's a trap.
|
|
By:
Cagliari what's wrong with that? https://snipboard.io/NSL12q.jpg
|
|
By:
Care to explain how 8/1 ew placed returns 2.6 Gaze?
|
|
By:
How much does it return then, genius?
|
|
By:
A capable amateur gaze….7lb in favour can’t be ignored…..
|
|
By:
You made the statement so explain how it is possible, even the thickest on here could probably tell you how stupid it was!!
|
|
By:
Apparently you're too thick to open the link I posted. If your argument is that the return is 0.6 then you're stupid because the place part of the bet returns 2.6.
In other words, I could back 9.0 and 1.85 on the exchange, or 9.0 and 2.6 with the bookie, the place part was therefore good value. |
|
By:
@TM I got matched at 1.72
|
|
By:
Hard to explain how thick you are Gaze but I will try, you said 1.83 on the exchange was worse value than 8/1 ew placed with the books which returns 1.6 including stake not 2.6 thicket!!
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Exactly T2R he things .60 is better than .83 , even with 2% commission the difference is obvious, he has done exactly as you have shown and stated the returns and not the profit or actual odds of return and has not subtracted the losing win stake!!
|
|
By:
You need to learn the difference between RETURN and PROFIT you idiot. Does the RETURN window look like 0.6 to you?
|
|
By:
ROFL, explain how .6 is better than .83?
|
|
By:
I never said that, I said THE PLACE PART RETURNS 2.6
You just invented a dumb straw man argument. |
|
By:
The place part returns .60p for £2 you thicket, 1.83 returns how much for the same stake? Keep digging and tell us how you think the ew is better value?
|
|
By:
You still don't know the difference between return and profit, and I'm a thicket, sure.
Your idiotic argument is that IF THE HORSE ONLY PLACES, THE PLACE-ONLY BET MAKES MORE PROFIT THAN AN EACH WAY BET. NO SH1T SHERLOCK, ITS BECAUSE THE WIN PART OF THE BET LOST. BUT THE PLACE BET RETURNED 2.6 COMPARED TO 1.85 on the exchange (Drifted to 2.15 BSP, still lower than 2.6) When you make an e/w bet it's because you want the horse to win, not just place, duh. |
|
By:
So why did you say the bookies were mugs and only mention the place part? You seem to be getting how thick you are and no amount of backtracking is going to rescue you, not even in CAPITALS!!
|
|
By:
Btw have you worked out the same stake @ 1.85 compared with your "return" yet, let us know which you think is better now that you seem to understanding how stupid you were?
|
|
By:
Bookies were mugs because they offered 2.6 for something that's 1.85 on the exchange, how thick are you?
|
|
By:
If you're so stupid to count the win bet as a place bet, here's a scenario for the horse winning:
Profit with bookie: 9.6 Profit at the exchange: 1.85 |
|
By:
They did not offer 2.6 thicket, 2.6 was the total return to a £2 stake, so tell us the return for the same @ 1.85?
You won't because you fail to accept you are wrong like the majority of the time you post. Get to Gamanon if you can't work out the difference!! |
|
By:
Actually, Profit at the exchange: 0.85
|
|
By:
X 2 = ?
|
|
By:
I'll explain it to you in another way to see how f-ing idiotic you are.
If bookies had no limits, you could bet 1000 E/W at 8/1, Then Lay 500 in the win market and 500 in the place market. If the horse only placed, your win bets would lose 2% on commission, you'd lose 500 on the place lay at evens and profit 800 with the bookie. Net profit 300 risk-free. |
|
By:
If your auntie had testicles she would be your uncle ( normally tbf) but no matter how many ways you want to try and twist what you said there is only one as thick as you, look in the mirror and guess!!
|
|
By:
What a pathetic argument.
Ok, I can simply scale down the numbers. 5 e/w bet with the bookie, lay off on the exchange, net profit 3 risk-free. Stake 10, profit 3, ROI 30%, chance of losing more than 2% of the stake: 0%. Tell me more about what a stupid bet it is. |
|
By:
Just admit what you stated was moronic and get on with learning simple arithmetic and come back in a few years when you have worked out how .60p is better than .85 X 2!!
|
|
By:
You never get tired of all this arguing Cagliari ? Ffs
|
|
By:
So you think stating obvious facts is about arguing Quixall or do you think Sociopaths should not be challenged and perhaps educated at the same time?
|