|
By:
"Amyndas is going to win it...Amyndas has won it". With the greatest 14/16f horse of my lifetime cruising behind.
![]() |
|
By:
Fascinating but I'm not sure Phil Bull comes out of it very well. From the start he comes across as a golf-club boor banging on about politics, and later on seems out-of-touch on the racecourse, with one bookmaker clearly never having heard of Bull's claimed FPTP betting arrangement. Presumably Bull had retired from day-to-day punting and form arrangement at least a decade earlier.
One point that has just occurred to me was that Bull makes the point he had to sell his speed figures under a pseudonym or he'd have been sacked as a teacher, even though he was earning far more from betting than as a teacher. Why did he care? He cared because he'd have been called up and sent to France with a rifle over his shoulder! Teaching was a reserved occupation. |
|
By:
Oops. Freudian slip! Form assessment, not arrangement. Bull was not fixing races. Luckily, the dead cannot sue for libel.
|
|
By:
Bull didn't like the prog. Not surprised. Great racing man but came across as a champers socialist hobnobbing with the toffs.
|
|
By:
"Doncaster had the cash,
so let Pontefract have the ash" |
|
By:
A few here would have loved those days with all that snobbery.
|
|
By:
I've read the biography by Howard Wright . He came from a very poor background and did very , very well -unclear as to how much came from punting and how much from profits from Timeform. He doesn't come across as a very pleasant person though.
|
|
By:
His money supposedly came first from the successful punting.
|
|
By:
"He doesn't come across as a very pleasant person though". Don't quite know what you mean there mano. But as regards betting you have to think you know everything and nearly everyone else knows nothing. Most pro's fit that description imo.
|
|
By:
I watched it this morning on tv YouTube which I have just discovered quiet enjoyable .
Howard if you saw ardross you must have seen le moss |
|
By:
yeah my fav races with those two jimnast. As Lester said there's a big difference between a two mile horse and a two and a half mile horse. Very confident 14f was Ardross optimum trip. Of course his class could allow him to beat Group 3 horses over much further. Lester also said Ardross was different class to Sagaro but I think we knew that. I do do think the two best Gold Cup horses in my time were Le Moss and Y eats. Couldn't choose the best.
|
|
By:
howard19 Mar 24 15:00Joined: 09 Mar 03 | Topic/replies: 13,225 | Blogger: howard's blog
as regards betting you have to think you know everything and nearly everyone else knows nothing. Most pro's fit that description imo. Possibly true howard ^ But an awful lot of degenerate, habitual, life-long losers also fit that description. |
|
By:
yeah TM but they would likely talk sh1te on most other subjects too. I don't think many would think that was the case with Bull. Manoleeds hasn't come back on this but I suspect he and he is not alone doesn't like people that come across like they know everything. I don't mind if they do know nearly everything especially if it's their specialist area.
|
|
By:
I think some on here don't like the idea of successful punters.
|
|
By:
Fair enough howard, each to their own but a little bit of humility, modesty or self-deprecation goes a long way imo.
It puts me right of when people are so definitive about a topic that is very subjective. |
|
By:
I would agree howard it’s between **** and le moss as the two best stayers I would go with le moss probably an age think ,whilst I know ardross was 2 nd in an arc I think many forget le moss was 2nd in a st leger and the score between them was 3 0 in favour of le moss .
|
|
By:
Ffs wouldn’t you think newsboy would grow a pair.
|
|
By:
an extremely wise comment sparrow. It's one of the main reasons why Betfair hasn't "gone to the moon". If you lose it's directly to other punters. If you win with bookies you still take money from other punters. Unless people think bookies are going bankrupt all the time which of course they are not certainly the big names.
|
|
By:
I don't why the quote sometimes works and sometimes doesn't -anyway meant to say that it was in his personal life not his punting life .
|
|
By:
"It puts me right of when people are so definitive about a topic that is very subjective". If by topic you mean betting I don't see how you could have a "problem " with anything a man that made half a million quid in the 50's says on that subject and how superior he feels to anyone else trying to make money betting on horses. But yes as my first post said there is likely a link with a person's character. Generally speaking I don't like teachers or landlords. Often people are both.
|
|
By:
I would suggest that what people on the forum might not like are his politics.
|
|
By:
personal life ? can you expand on that ?
![]() |
|
By:
yeah they might not like him being ( extreme ) left wing. OR they may like him being left wing but not like the toff social life rolls-royce and living in a "castle"
|
|
By:
Should he have lived in a council house and deprived other people?
|
|
By:
idiot fred. coward is a g1 wanchor and conspiracy mug. stfu you twerp
|
|
By:
We all know what nearly everyone here thinks of you.
|
|
By:
I found him interesting and his betting strange until I realised he was covering himself quite a lot by backing 2 or possibly 3 in the same race , his idea of value left a lot to be desired imo . Golden Fleece been a prime example , having had inside info from Robert and the horse going from twos out to 3 surely made him a value bet.I was also surprised how often he got it wrong even even watching it live on T.V..Ardross race been a clear example , still a brilliant mind when you think what Timeform ended up becoming, I was always perplexed about who he reminded me of until it he said George Bernard Shaw was his idol then the beard became obvious....
|
|
By:
Wrote for a job 1968 ......
|
|
By:
Byline: HOWARD WRIGHT
DICK WHITFORD, who could rightfully lay claim to being the father of modern handicapping, as well as the joint-founder of Timeform, has died. He would have been 93 on Thursday, and his health had been in decline since the death of his wife Julie 18 months ago. Whitford invented a system of handicapping by ratings as an extension of his interest in logarithms and mathematics, and used it to occupy spare time after being called up as first officer on a hospital ship during the Second World War, when he was involved both at Dunkirk and in the D-Day landings. He first went to sea after leaving school at the age of 14 to support his family on his father's death, but left the Merchant Navy in 1932 to become an advertising copywriter for the electrical company Ecko. As the war drew to a close in 1945, Whitford arranged to meet Phil Bull, who had been publishing time figures for a number of years, at Newmarket. An offer to join Bull as his assistant followed and the marriage of Bull's time figures and Whitford's form ratings became public for the first time in April 1948. The ratings became the basis upon which Timeform's international status, as well as the sport's current handicapping system, were founded, although Bull did not publicly acknowledge Whitford's significance and the pair parted company at the end of 1949, when financial and business promises made by Bull to Whitford failed to materialise. Whitford turned down an offer to work for William Hill and instead became racing manager and private handicapper to racehorse owner Jack Gerber, in what proved to be a most successful period for his horses. When Gerber returned to South Africa in 1971, Whitford became The Sporting Life's Flat-race handicapper until ill health forced him to retire in 1984. He and his wife went to Mallorca, from where they returned three years ago to live near their daughter Sue in Devon. Whitford served as the Racegoers' Club's nominee on the Horseracing Advisory Council - the forerunner of the Industry Committee - for over three years. Ironically, he was chosen to replace Phil Bull. The funeral is at Exeter crematorium on Friday at 2.30pm. Published March 2004. |
|
By:
^ For anybody who like me didn't know this till today, the old timers could probably bring more light on it.
|
|
By:
workrider , jim mcgrath was asked would Bull have liked Betfair? " very much " " why"? "Laying "
|
|
By:
Howard , met Jim in Leopardstown several years ago and we had a brilliant chat from him looking for relatives in Ireland to finding out one of them was a witch, to him having £2,000 at 16/1 on Welds first winner of the Melbourne Cup...A very interesting guy , ladycarlas piece on Dick Whitford is thought provoking and sadly I never even heard of him till I read her piece , seems a much under rated part of Timeform from what she wrote...
|
|
By:
yes apparently Bull offered him buttons for what was arguably the most important part of the job.
|
|
By:
Dick Whitford's (flat) ratings used to be on page 2 of the life on the settlers page, if I remember correctly only using his basic ratings with no other filters for draw or going ect only lost 2%.
|
|
By:
Workrider .
I used to follow Dick Whitford in the life well over 40 years ago. |
|
By:
What has happened to onlooker who would know plenty about Whitford and his work?
|
|
By:
Sparrow onlooker often takes a break from the forum
|
|
By:
Ronnie obviously read him myself without been aware who he was...
|