There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
06 Feb 24
13:32
Joined:
Date Joined:
25 Dec 05
heard ratpack prattling on about wanting to back jonbon ante post and not NRNB on moaning line at weekend,wanted fabiulo to wipe out irish horses at DRF,then back jonbon antepost
slybet are 7 to 2 NRNB
4,s antepost
why would you back antepost for a half a point and risk losing the lot ?
slybet are 7 to 2 NRNB
4,s antepost
why would you back antepost for a half a point and risk losing the lot ?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 9
|
By:
Based on that example 1sttp you'd be backing at 1/9 the horse will make post time , madness
 |
|
By:
think he was just overthinking it and trying to look clever on tv,at this stage you might as well wait till raceday anyway or NRNB, antepost wouldnt even enter your mind ,let alone rattle away on tv about it
|
|
By:
Does the NRNB option get Rule 4 deductions?
|
|
By:
No Longbridge it's a bookmaker concession , usually find in NRNB markets that the over rounds are pretty excessive though so limiting the potential damage for bookmakers offering the concession just to be competitive.
|
|
By:
at this stage you might as well wait till raceday anyway or NRNB, antepost wouldnt even enter your mind ,let alone rattle away on tv about it
100% agree |
|
By:
at the ridiculous overrounds NRNB wouldn't interest me either
|
|
By:
You'd have to either desperate or not thinking it through to be effectively taking 1/9 for a horse to make post time at Cheltenham , based of the OP's example.
|
|
By:
thanks Hayden
|
|
By:
i couldnt work out ratpacks thinking why if you were wanted to back jonbon in any formatt would you want the fav to hammer its over irish rivals,it would only make jonbon a shorter price and on all current evidence less likely to beat the fav
sorry it was on lucky where he was babbling away more i think about it ,think he was just trying to sound superior to fellow lady guest, because none of it makes any sense to me |