Wrong to reinstate Aston Martini ?

I agree but Chemical gets special treatment.

Original thread here https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31829717/ste...

RICO is the head steward at ling..

did it affect the result rico?  No (imo)


Another correct call in the end. Hendo backers at 14/1 will be sick.

Happy Hibby 

no Mr.Hunt...

the rule is seen differently om a DAILY basis...

this could happen tomorrow at a different track and be interpreted differently...

and the result could STAND.

that WAS my point...

pity it went way over your head...

you got it wrong Mr.Hunt...

no need to try and deflect (which is what you always do)...

hold your hands up...

you were WRONG kid.     

Cost me a bob or two that one did.

https://www.attheraces.com/news/2024/February/01/
aston-martini-regains-lingfield-victory-on-appeal

it was one of those that was down to stewarding on the day, we get inconsistent calls, what we're having in racing with appeals is var a month late when the horse has somewhat bolted

some firms pay 1st past the post or double result ,whatever if ya backed the winner ya had plenty of time to green up !

thats not aimed at you jamee1 ,just saying .

u did foyles, my issue is more the image it paints of the sport to people that maybe are just starting to bet or don't go racing or use the exchanges much

i think racing is poorly run and most initiatives are either saving face efforts after feck ups or ideas to appease the minorities that want to get rid of the sport or change it, they never really seem to do much about making anything really improve it's all words, steering groups and ideas that go nowhere

agree with that elise ^