UK financial regulators have fined HSBC £57.4mn for “serious failings” in safeguarding the deposits of some customers over a period of seven years. Among several failings laid out by the regulator, HSBC incorrectly marked 99 per cent of eligible beneficiary deposits at its non-ringfenced UK bank as “ineligible” for consumer protection.
If that was the case I'd think that someone at the PRA would be getting the sack, for not noticing such a glaring error on financial returns.
As an aside I wonder if the trust holding Flutter's ringfenced customer deposits is eleigible for one 85k payout or mulitiple per customer?
If that was the case I'd think that someone at the PRA would be getting the sack, for not noticing such a glaring error on financial returns.As an aside I wonder if the trust holding Flutter's ringfenced customer deposits is eleigible for one 85k pay
@revs hsbc were the number one bank for shutting down poker players accounts due to cash turnover, (while also happily doing business with drug cartels in mexico).
@revs hsbc were the number one bank for shutting down poker players accounts due to cash turnover, (while also happily doing business with drug cartels in mexico).
I happened to be in one of their vaults where they stored trunks ect some of them were very old so I thought I would have a look to see what they contained.
I happened to be in one of their vaults where they stored trunks ect some of them were very old so I thought I would have a look to see what they contained.
looking some more I think you're right longbridge. The accounts ( the majority of which were involved ) were in the non ring fenced accounts. The retail bank accounts were separated in 2018.
looking some more I think you're right longbridge. The accounts ( the majority of which were involved ) were in the non ring fenced accounts. The retail bank accounts were separated in 2018.