|
By:
why dont you also aftertime the 30 4 folds?
|
|
By:
Liverpool match result btts = 1 line
Newcastle or draw match result btts = 2 lines Brentford or draw match result btts = 2 lines Man City ht/ft = 1 line 4 lines , shirley? |
|
By:
roadrunner, do you understand perms and accas?
|
|
By:
A...Liverpool match result btts
B/C...Newcastle or draw match result btts D/E...Brentford or draw match result btts F...Man City ht/ft 3 lines 30 4 folds ABDF ACDF ACEF ABEF 4 FOUR FOLDS. ![]() |
|
By:
Judging by the winning slip he posted the other day, I think he’s placing these manually and doesn’t have full cover.
|
|
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps • January 29, 2024 4:24 PM GMT
4 FOUR FOLDS. I reckon it's: ABDF ACDF ABEF Not sure why RR is always so ambiguous with what lines are covered. |
|
By:
posssibly ken
can imagine him reading the replies and then scrambling around his gaff looking for the other fixed odds machine print-out ![]() |
|
By:
jamee1 29 Jan 24 16:30
Rico-Dangleflaps • January 29, 2024 4:24 PM GMT 4 FOUR FOLDS. I reckon it's: ABDF ACDF ABEF Not sure why RR is always so ambiguous with what lines are covered. why not ACEF ? |
|
By:
Just guessing that he removed the line that would have had both the Newcastle and Brentford matches to draw.
|
|
By:
ewe psychic?
|
|
By:
3 lines 30 4 folds
|
|
By:
Pretty daft covering three out of the four perms. At least we won’t know which one isn’t covered should they all land!
|
|
By:
https://community.betfair.com/football/go/forum/view/94070/165718/football
|
|
By:
how can ewe have 30 4 folds with 5 selleckshuns?
|
|
By:
3 lines @ £30 a line.
|
|
By:
Would help if RR could just tell us which lines are covered. MEEP MEEP!
|
|
By:
£4677 for a £30 treble?
|
|
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps • January 29, 2024 5:12 PM GMT
£4677 for a £30 treble? It's four-folds. |
|
By:
£30 four fold. 150/1 sounds about right.
|
|
By:
Dunno he bets with but PP going
6/1 for a Brentford win with BBTS 9/2 " " Newcastle " " " Lpool game 9/20 for BTTS Man city 4/11 HT/FT 75/1 4 timer Newcastle and Brentford in the bottom four of the premiership table for their 'away' record this season. |
|
By:
*BTTS
|
|
By:
One of the busiest threads of the day is trying to second-guess this guys bets.
![]() |
|
By:
It’s Pool to win and btts, Leif.
|
|
By:
163/1 with b365. Those in shop machines are usually much lower.
|
|
By:
would make sense odds wise.
can you type out his bets for him on here please ![]() |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
3 lines 30 4 folds
|
|
By:
Newcastle or draw match result btts
first leg up -good call given the tie |
|
By:
Or was that the omitted leg!!!?
|
|
By:
close but no cigar, made 500 on a cover bet, made mistakes should of been lot more, minimum 1000 winnings on the cover bet, had enough games on the tuesday to win 5k, take consolation from the knowledge i know can beat the books easily doing these type of football bets now. goodluck this weekend without my help
![]() |
|
By:
What cover bet did you do?
|
|
By:
Had spurs in the cover bet without the Newcastle match, didn’t realise the potential winnings was only 500, as the bets are btts to score as well, done few correct score trebles, only certain score lines possible, palace game on Tuesday was a no brainer, arsenal match, touch and go wether forest would score, it was worth a bet the tuesday treble had Man City to win 3-1 with Liverpool to win 3-1 , didn’t cover those score lines in yesterday’s matches sufficiently, would paid around 3 or 4k, on 3 pound bets on correct score trebles
|
|
By:
a subtle aftertime saves the day..
happy daze. |
|
By:
It wasn’t really a cover bet. It was several more bets.
|
|
By:
Finally a pro footy bettor
|
|
By:
had Man City to win 3-1 with Liverpool to win 3-1 , didn’t cover those score lines in yesterday’s matches sufficiently, would paid around 3 or 4k, on 3 pound bets on correct score trebles
Liverpool won 4-1 |
|
By:
Lol, the old cover bet coming to the rescue. Great stuff OP.
|
|
By:
Just picked up 188 on the West Ham draw, weekend bets paid for, wrote some games down for weekend, teams are playing a lot of games these last few days, could make things more difficult, take a fresh look tomorrow
|
|
By:
![]() ![]() |