|
By:
Why did Pag open at odds on ?
|
|
By:
1 bump and won cosy - how could they claim that altered the 2nd place??
|
|
By:
Didn't touch the race after seeing the FPTP swerving through the final furlong. But it didn't look nearly as bad head-on. Managed to get some 3.5 on FPTP in the early betting and lay off for some nice green.
Betting has since settled to a more realistic 1.13 to keep. |
|
By:
saw that too AR - mad!
|
|
By:
Worse than the scandalous 100/1 reversal yesterday over the jumps.
Inconsistently will keep it. |
|
By:
Really confused at that one. I tried to lay but was too slow. Couldn't believe it. Must be massive odds on to keep the race
|
|
By:
Someone laying the 2nd at 1000 is sweating
|
|
By:
3rd place still in the betting too
![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
The swerve made it look bad - but the contact was next to nothing.
|
|
By:
been in there a while, sweating now lads
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
The winner didn't even go near the 2nd either, which makes it even more mad.
|
|
By:
They can't turn this around surely?
![]() |
|
By:
Stands
|
|
By:
correct decision of course, but what were 2ndptp backers thinking...??
|
|
By:
stu 25 Jan 24 12:32
no chance surely to amend? PYB...TIA |
|
By:
'no chance' is clear enough rico
![]() |
|
By:
PYB...TIA
lets see how sertan u were. |