There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
11 Jan 24
18:07
Joined:
Date Joined:
07 Sep 18
only 1 horse on photo screen and slo mo 
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 33
|
By:
epidemic of double ls on here lately, did I miss the memo?
|
|
By:
a multi million £ game ran by absolute and utter complete clowns.
|
|
By:
two horses on my slow mo and photo screen Mr.Hunt.
obviously the winner wasn't one of them tho. |
|
By:
Doubtfull swifty, everyone got it.
|
|
By:
that's quite comical for you saddo has your account been hacked?
|
|
By:
That slomo was hilarious!
|
|
By:
going to bet that some folk were backing on the 2nd / 3rd still
|
|
By:
someone please elucidate how the phot betting was formed?
|
|
By:
you're not suggesting something iffy was going on are you Mr.Hunt ?
heaven forbid. |
|
By:
was being sarky..could only be formed from the gps imo.
|
|
By:
what was the photo betting ?
as soon as the favourite went out of shot i lost interest tbh. |
|
By:
out of picture winner held firm around 1.6 I think.
|
|
By:
was 1/3 3/1 for quite a while then started to flop flip.
|
|
By:
Racetech cameraperson focusing on the runner up might have helped with that scenario Mr.Hunt.
|
|
By:
When you see the actual photo it would have been 1.01 in betting.
|
|
By:
which begs another question, why so long to call it?
|
|
By:
it's a Q only a few folk on here would actually ask swifty...
anyone in any sort of authority (if there is actually such a person) wouldn't even think to ask a Q like that... unfortunately. |
|
By:
ive seen dozens of clear photo results thats taken an age..is no rime or reeson.
|
|
By:
so it's just one of those things is it Mr.Hunt...?
nowt iffy about it whatsoever ? |
|
By:
Possible explanations:
A)Judge in the loo whilst race being run, no toilet paper B)Technical issues C)Judge texting wife about dinner time (coded be home at 7, back the near side, be home at 8, back the far side, no paper trail, just in case) |
|
By:
100% it was A swifty...
if you've got to go you've got to go after all. |
|
By:
HappyHibby 12 Jan 24 09:04
so it's just one of those things is it Mr.Hunt...? nowt iffy about it whatsoever ? majority dont shorten..so no,nowt iffy..but won 6" and teks 3 mins..seen plenty. |
|
By:
therefore the explanation is ???
|
|
By:
ned
technical i presume. |
|
By:
If there was anything dodgy going on the winner wouldn't have been sat there for over a minute at 1.6. It would have been hoovered up.
|
|
By:
you've seen plenty but every time it takes longer than it should do it's due to an IT issue...
aye ok then. |
|
By:
ive been on here virtually ev day for 20yrs...
repeat.. ive seen dozens of foto's thats taken 2-5 mins and aint shortened and won easy...ive no explanation the reason. |
|
By:
no no...
it's always IT issues... and you ain't the only one who has done the 20 years thing so it's pointless repeating yourself... |
|
By:
jamee1, hoovering would be a bit silly(although seen in ireland often), little and often said the judge.
|
|
By:
swifty...
Mr.Hunt has been on here almost every day for 20 years... he says the delays are always IT issues... so that is clearly the FACT of the matter... the opinion of others is irrelevant when it comes to Mr.Hunt. |
|
By:
in this day and age a 3-minute delay is inexplicable whatever the winning distance, they call dead heats in the States in 1 minute.
|
|
By:
i agree swifty...
but clearly i am mistaken... Mr.Hunt has been on here virtually every day for 20 years... so he clearly knows everything about all the odd little things that happen with in running etc... nobody else's opinion is valid. |
|
By:
ty hibs..respect.
|