|
By:
Put the fac in its place, won easily.
|
|
By:
Usually I agree with these posts but in these cases what can they do. Has to be done to protect a blood bath against each way thieves. Ideally they'd run a win only market to level it up but not sure that's allowed
|
|
By:
Fav
|
|
By:
A nicely named horse for the Each Way Thieves!
![]() |
|
By:
What a sh#t hole for punting Newcastle track is. (:
|
|
By:
Let's say they offer 5/1 and actually took bets. Any of us shrewd punters could sit back all year and just max each way bet these selections on a massive free hit on the win each time
|
|
By:
The point is that all those that punters who backed Hopeful to win and not each way were ripped off.
|
|
By:
We go through this every time there's a bad e/way race but we all know the reason for it.
|
|
By:
This has happened before?
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
If it stops a few people betting win only with bookies on these races then we have helped those people.
|
|
By:
2/13 & 7/2
just wow ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Anyone who thinks that's a win only bet and not an e/way one is beyond help anyway sparrow.
|
|
By:
A lot more than you would think, hayden. Many bookmaker punters don't even know the exchange exists.
|
|
By:
entirely understanable. although the 2nd in choc-ice has shrunk by 20% since the shakedown
|
|
By:
In fairness even the Totes ripoff software got that one wrong.!
![]() |
|
By:
If it stops a few people betting win only with bookies on these races then we have helped those people.
prime example of why each-way betting should be abolished and bookies forced to display 2 markets, a win and a place. want each-way ? no problem, fiver on both. |