|
By:
its clearly won but equipment is kapoot
|
|
By:
35 people " viewing this thread"
|
|
By:
im 17 of them
|
|
By:
Stewards Enquiry
|
|
By:
Lil
|
|
By:
35 people " betting on this market"
plus padi. |
|
By:
Stewards enquiry into the result.
|
|
By:
Other horses foot was further over the line
|
|
By:
Strange goings on...
|
|
By:
Stands
|
|
By:
british racing making it up on the hoof...more amateur every week
|
|
By:
weird one
|
|
By:
Photo equipment wasn't working. Result was judged manually, I assume using video evidence. Then the stewards wanted the judge in the room to discuss the manual process undertaken before it was posted official.
|
|
By:
suprised didnt call a dh.
|
|
By:
indeed
|
|
By:
suprised didnt call a dh.
post your 1.04 losing lay then ... |
|
By:
THE NAF NOVICES' HURDLE RACE (CLASS 4) (GBB RACE)
There was a delay to the weighed in for this race whilst the Judging verification procedure was undertaken to determine the outcome of a photo finish for first and second place, following which the result was confirmed. The Stewards held an enquiry to consider why the photo finish cameras had failed in the first race. They interviewed the Judge and the Photo Finish Operator, who explained that having triggered the photo finish it initially began to record, before failing as the horses crossed the line. He added that the equipment was re-tested before the start of race 2. Having heard their evidence, the Stewards ordered a report to be forwarded to the British Horseracing Authority. |
|
By:
Short head, nose surely.
|
|
By:
when's Emily's annual appraisal ?
|
|
By:
i thort had wun same length as hulks peenus..approx 3"
![]() |
|
By:
all that time banged up with another man hasn't been good for you Rico.
|
|
By:
If they only had the TV video to go on then it should have been a dead heat.
|
|
By:
walofs..clear winner.
|
|
By:
agree Rico. For years before 1947 they had no photo or film.
|
|
By:
[ This image is no longer available. ]
|