|
By:
harry
|
|
By:
£8000+ @1.02
|
|
By:
ouch
|
|
By:
DH so all is not lost.
|
|
By:
soz swifty..dont often stay after 7 ish...what was photo betting please?
|
|
By:
the other one went 50 for peanuts in the photo, think the big bet on the Fav must've been in the photo as too close a call for in-play. Thought with your'angles' you might've fancied the far one in the photo, it tightened up as the photo went on ,still looked hard for far side to have won on ATR pics and their still but it got the DH.
|
|
By:
one horse opened up around 1.13(ish) - the other horse the comparable opposite price.
The 1.18 moved out 1.25 > 1.33 and eventually up to something like 1.58. Remained as Fav in Photo Betting - No Flip-Flop |
|
By:
watched replay on sp life..too hard to call and no slo mo..the race before the far side looked an inch ahead.
|
|
By:
Back (Bet For)
Odds Stake Profit Captain Kane 1.09 £4,500.00 £394.22 Total stake: £4,500.00 Lay (Bet Against) Backer's odds Backer's stake Arcadian Friend 21.00 £277.92 £5,836.08 copped a good foto yest..stopped it bang on live on atr..1st in.. |
|
By:
nice one, got a good bob in, where was the 1.01 for £20G paddy/SIS man, having a race off?!
|
|
By:
im convinced the gps only any good when its obvious..winner made 4L up last fur and was finishing fast..hard to tell live..
|
|
By:
gps on some of the US stuff is often wrong when they've crossed the line. Thought the SIS still man would've snapped that up(if he has no delay!)
|
|
By:
when I say wrong I mean 1/2l wrong.
|
|
By:
how do you know when photos arnt opened?
|
|
By:
i wasn't meaning the betting, the finishing possies are wrong.
|
|
By:
the coloured numbers on the screen?
|
|
By:
yes, not reliable enough to play. Is ahead and no doubt software can utilise some of the million live data packs available but manually not far enough ahead to be useful (for me at least)
|
|
By:
roger.
|