There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
back at 1.05, or lay at 21.0?
and what would your reasons be?
would you say that pro-rata the amount of 1.05 that lose was equal to the amount of 21.0 that win? mathematically it should be, but sometimes things don't work out like they should, as we all know
and what would your reasons be?
would you say that pro-rata the amount of 1.05 that lose was equal to the amount of 21.0 that win? mathematically it should be, but sometimes things don't work out like they should, as we all know
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 3
|
By:
If you Back at 1.05 - Then - You only have ONE Chace of Winning
If you Lay at 21.0 - Then - You have whole of the rest of the Field running for you. |
|
By:
Sooner back at 21 and lay it when it goes to 1.05
 |
|
By:
in theory onlooker, the bets should have exactly the same chance of winning, giving the same profit. id favour laying though as you say
|