There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
27 Jun 23
17:59
Joined:
Date Joined:
10 Oct 02
WTF!!!!!!! - what no-one cares about places - not shown for last 3 flights OR even at the winning line - somebody shake this shambles up FFS!!!!!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 22
|
By:
Absolutely useless!
|
|
By:
Agreed, very amateurish and ill thought out by whoever is in charge.
|
|
By:
The winner was an insane distance clear from 4 out. Sixty-eight lengths doesn't begin to describe how far clear it was.
|
|
By:
I watched a couple of races from South Africa yesterday afternoon,both races the camera focused on the far side till just before the line when the near side runners filled all the places.An extel commentary would have been more helpful to anyone with an interest in the races.
|
|
By:
Would a split screen per the US racing not be a better option, with side on and head on pics.
|
|
By:
Extel, " At Pontefract, add number 7 to the photo. "
|
|
By:
How the hell did Vitani get beaten 68 lengths into second there? What manner of beast is Max Of Stars?
|
|
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves 16 Jul 23 15:00
How the hell did Vitani get beaten 68 lengths into second there? What manner of beast is Max Of Stars? Beaten off 56 last time on the flat. |
|
By:
Bonkers, isn't it?
Max Of Steel was so far clear it was impossible for the camera to cover the gap.You think back to the days of Martin Pipe, or to mad front-runners like Sakr, and I still can't think of any race at Newton Abbot that's comparable. Yet the second turns out to be a perfectly good early-season 3yo! |
|
By:
*Sorry. Max Of Stars.
|
|
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves16 Jul 23 15:00Joined: 30 Jan 05 | Topic/replies: 14,763 | Blogger: screaming from beneaththewaves's blog
How the hell did Vitani get beaten 68 lengths into second there? What manner of beast is Max Of Stars? We might find out in an hour at Newton Abbott. |
|
By:
Will the cameraman keep up today?
|
|
By:
Interesting race this one, to see if it can repeat that run/win.
|
|
By:
Hopefully it will.
|
|
By:
The rpr for that win was 89 according to the race report.
Not exactly massive, given the winning margin. |
|
By:
The runner up must have improved a little then
 |
|
By:
Booom
|
|
By:
Got home, though not quite as easy.
|
|
By:
Got a bit lit up but did the business.
|
|
By:
Stu,
That 89 RPR would be 110 for an older horse, as they take off the weight for age allowance, which is 21lbs in June for a 3yo hurdler. |
|
By:
Winner rated higher on the flat as well.
|
|
By:
yeh good point Anorak...
|