|
By:
I'm not sure I could find those winners with the results section in front of me. WD to the Hills punter after what one imagines is a lifetime of 50p e/w lucky 31s.
|
|
By:
Let's hope he doesn't fail the affordability check.I'm sure there wouldn't be a RP article then.
|
|
By:
What a win. Well done that man.
|
|
By:
Where does it say it’s a man ?
|
|
By:
Great stuff , the bookies don't mind the occasional result like this , better advertising than any celebrity themed rubbish........
|
|
By:
Half a million payout- But millions in advertising
|
|
By:
Good grief…..
|
|
By:
He should have left out the ew and done £1 win lucky 31!! Wimp
|
|
By:
Wasn't you this time then 626!
|
|
By:
Jeez even the happy stories attract negativity
WD whoever they are. |
|
By:
I am waiting for the endless debate on a supposed cashout and the advice as to what he should have done.
![]() |
|
By:
Bear Force One was well backed near the off too!
|
|
By:
https://www.attheraces.com/atrplayer-popout/VOD/1346016/true?showResult=yes
Imagine cheering your last horse home. What a feeling that must have been ![]() |
|
By:
That rule 4 on the last one must have made a fair difference...?
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
surprised the reporter didn't frame it as "bookie using technicality to reduce punter's payday by quarter of million"
|
|
By:
Great win , well done that person whoever you are
![]() |
|
By:
But you don’t know them Hayden….could be any stamp….
|
|
By:
Don't care about that Ace , like to see big winners and also rather than post sad faces on the 1.01 beat threads associated with losers would much rather congratulate the 1.01 layers.
Always been more interested in winners than losers ![]() |
|
By:
Superb win & GL for whoever it was.
|
|
By:
40/1 even with a 45% deduction is a lot better than the SP. Someone dropped a rick pricing that one up!
|
|
By:
Wasn't you this time then 626!
Nope Stewart , I cannot put that type of bet on with them anymore.....well I can if it is a combination of Golf , Football , Snooker , tiddlywinks .......but not a single horse amongst them....... |
|
By:
Lies......everything is lies............it's all lies!!!!
|
|
By:
I agree Hayden nothing better than seeing a punter collecting a few quid if they are decent….
|
|
By:
Just a splash to a company that can afford a hit
|
|
By:
19.5 million to find off laying Irish Lottos and cartoon racing will take some pegging back.
Fck em |
|
By:
Yep totally agree….as long as the person is decent and not an undesirable
|
|
By:
fair play to the bugger but why do people do these tiny stake luckies. do you really want 50p on the last 3 after the others have gone in? do a canadian by all means but the singles are simply bollox
|
|
By:
Well done sparrow
![]() |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Nice. But that rule 4 in the last
|
|
By:
It's a big deduction Freddie for sure but then again if no withdrawal he may not have had a full winning multi , we'll never know of course.
|
|
By:
It beat s.p. with deductions. Limit stakes incoming
|
|
By:
Well done and good luck to the punter!! Can anyone explain what is "audacious" about a 50p EW Lucky 31??
|
|
By:
Hills trying to claw back a bit of positive publicity after their record fine
|
|
By:
always seems to be william hill big payouts
anyone seen a big payout threesixfives |
|
By:
yeah, that 19 yo student who placed all those combo bets
![]() |
|
By:
A Bet365 account in the name of McCann, who was a 19-year-old student at the time, placed a stake of almost £25,000 on 12 horses running in races at Bath, Kempton Park and Naas on 22 June 2016. Bet365 accepted the bets – a combined total of 960 £13 each-way Lucky 15s – which were mostly successful and returned a total payout of £984,833.
However, Bet365 refused to pay the winnings, claiming the original stake for the bets had been provided by a third party in contravention of the firm’s terms and conditions. It also refused to refund the £25,000 stake. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/jun/12/megan-mccann-case-bet-365-discontinued |
|
By:
Settled out of court subject to non-disclosure agreement! Rumours that terms favourable to the bookmaker, but then they would say that wouldn't they.
|