|
By:
yep, they rather knew there...
|
|
By:
Did the fav go wrong? Went from travelling well to pulled up in 50 yards
|
|
By:
ex Mcnally horse , did it go to the sales or is this another proxy trainer job
|
|
By:
he may be the subject of an inquiry/long term ban is Ronan McNally but the way that it was punted would possibly suggest than he may be still involved in it some way!!!
|
|
By:
70s into 8.4
Filth! But good fun! |
|
By:
DATE
DIST. GNG. WGT / HDGR SP JOCKEY OR TS RPR 20Feb23 Crl inner C5HcH 3K 2m1f GS 11-10 9/14 btn 48L Malaita 11-8 125/1 L Harrison3 104 32 69 52 days break 30Dec22 Tau C4HcH 5K 2m3f GS 11-10 10/15 btn 65L Fame And Fun 10-5 66/1 F Lambert 106 21 57 01Dec22 Mar C4HcH 6K 2m½f GS 11-9 7/7 btn 62L Ilanz 10-11 18/1 Caoilin Quinn 110 — 62 51 days break ![]() |
|
By:
It's previous runs must have been 'interesting' before this one...
|
|
By:
Hushwing. 27 Mar 23 17:11
ex Mcnally horse , did it go to the sales or is this another proxy trainer job ------------ Not been through the Sales Ring - According to websites. |
|
By:
Many sifting through the form last night.. "well I can certainly rule this no-hoper out".. (while the gambling clairvoyants be s****ing)
|
|
By:
No doubt Potter will deny all knowledge.
Gamble, what gamble? It reeks, but I guess that is the risk you take when you bet in low grade racing. |
|
By:
Potter has a habit of doing this won’t be long before he gets the Ronan treatment .. didn’t think it jumped that well either else could have won far more easy
|
|
By:
The apparent improvement in form of the winner, ITHAKA (IRE) which had never previously been placed, was considered. Ryan Potter was interviewed. His comments that ITHAKE (IRE) benefitted from the drop in grade
and in his opinion an uncompetitive race , along with the poor performance of the favourite were forwarded to the Head Office of the British Horseracing Authority so they that could be reviewed in conjunction with the previous performances of ITHAKA (IRE), and the gelding was routine tested. |
|
By:
if you are plotting one why not have an OKish prior run, accept you may only get 10s not 30s but have 3 times as much on, not a problem if you know it's a winner in waiting , and you might just keep your license.
|
|
By:
Potter appears very foolish to mix himself up in this . Certainly be given at least a warning here
|
|
By:
I don't believe any of them give a damn. Once in the loop, their confidence is at a level where they simply sneer at any disciplinary measures that could possibly come their way.
|
|
By:
Top weight wins a h'cap nothing to see hear
|
|
By:
Bentring 28 Mar 23 07:07
Top weight wins a h'cap nothing to see hear Specsavers awaits. |
|
By:
Specsavers awaits? It was a low grade h'cap fav was rated 84 winner was top weight rated 16lb higher obviously h'capper thought him the better horse
|
|
By:
Got the lot,.......again
|