There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
17 Mar 23
22:13
Joined:
Date Joined:
11 Jan 03
So Cheltenham officially stated the going was Soft through the final day. Absolute disgrace. It was probably Good, good to soft in places before the Gold Cup.
The race was actually run in a time below standard ...this suggests it was Good to firm , Good in places !!
Absolute disgrace how Cheltenham cannot understand the modern technology they have to produce correct going reports. How can you bet with such incorrect information from an appalling amateurish Clerk of the Course at the premium meeting of the year.
The race was actually run in a time below standard ...this suggests it was Good to firm , Good in places !!
Absolute disgrace how Cheltenham cannot understand the modern technology they have to produce correct going reports. How can you bet with such incorrect information from an appalling amateurish Clerk of the Course at the premium meeting of the year.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 2
|
By:
Drains too quickly especially on the New Course
|
|
By:
Given as soft (good to soft in places), but never updated.
|