Mar 8, 2023 -- 6:24PM, sparrow wrote:
We can see what onlooker wrote, devils
TY My old mate Sparrows ! Forum not posting what I wrote. Maybe Im subject to the bf forum polizia ?
Mar 8, 2023 -- 6:57PM, unitedbiscuits wrote:
This is true from c 10 years ago:Betfair asked if their brand could get fair coverage in the Racing Post(other than the one page they advertised every day) and Bruce Millington told them it would cost them £1 million a year. Betfair said no and the Racing Post basically kept on ignoring it.You have to wonder where would Racing Post be if 10,000 betting shops weren't buying it and their wallsheets every day. I mean, no form-reader in their right mind is going to rely on the last three runs printed in the paper, especially in winter.
This is what I don't get...how on Earth can anyone tell if they fancy something without watching it run from 3 form lines in a paper???
The technology is there to watch it yourself.
Mar 9, 2023 -- 12:21AM, onlooker wrote:
The Form tells you much More than watching Videos, though. Watching Videos - is of NO use whatsoever - Without knowing ... What Weights the horses were carrying What the Going was What level of ability the horses in the race are/were - relative to each other - and an absolute myriad of other factors than just watching horses running against each other, as (without knowing such Facts) is merely made meaningless. But - I agree - Just 3 lines of outings in a newspaper will not give you a full horse Profile - That is why many of us, along with Trainers and the like, of course, Subscribed to the (twice) weekly updated Loose-Leaf Raceform Form Book binder .... well before the Internet appeared.... and Video Replays, too.We didn't do too bad.
Bizzare, how do you see what it ran against with ease last race?
Mar 10, 2023 -- 2:52PM, Rico-Dangleflaps wrote:
no rp's on tyneside today
All been sent North, is a few shocking punters up there.