Good decision , no going back from what she did and that Sky interview stating she had no regrets regarding her trip to Syria made the ruling pretty simple.
Where she lives now or ends up , that's her problem.
Good decision , no going back from what she did and that Sky interview stating she had no regrets regarding her trip to Syria made the ruling pretty simple.Where she lives now or ends up , that's her problem.
don't think you have to be a citizen Rico to qualify. Just need to be bringing an action in the UK courts, and have no £. It is how all those fighting deportation qualify. If I am wrong on that, there are oodles of firms who would do this case pro bono as a loss leader.
don't think you have to be a citizen Rico to qualify. Just need to be bringing an action in the UK courts, and have no £. It is how all those fighting deportation qualify. If I am wrong on that, there are oodles of firms who would do this case pro b
Her case, which started at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), has since been heard at the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, which upheld Mr Javid’s decision.
Legal experts believe that the cost of the case – in which Begum received legal aid – has already cost more than £2million.
Paul Fulcher, who runs specialist firm Legal Costs Experts, said: ‘You have to remember that some of these barristers can charge up to £1,000 per hour and this case has gone on for almost two years through several courts.
‘If the whole process starts again and ends up at the Supreme Court, the whole thing could cost taxpayers upwards of £5million.’
Her case, which started at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), has since been heard at the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, which upheld Mr Javid’s decision.Legal experts believe that the cost of the case – in
After all the money spent it will probably end up at the ECHR... I would have blown her up so now the second next best option just leave her rot in that Syrian camp
After all the money spent it will probably end up at the ECHR... I would have blown her up so now the second next best option just leave her rot in that Syrian camp
her defence lawyer said she was forced by traffickers to go, it didn't look like to me, now trying to look westernised, maybe her best chance is to turn binary, allah praise be. cheers
her defence lawyer said she was forced by traffickers to go, it didn't look like to me, now trying to look westernised, maybe her best chance is to turn binary, allah praise be. cheers
She was radicalised on-line but then aren't all of these religious fanatics. The fact remains at an older age, she went on camera smirking at the thought of infidels being beheaded. Just a shame she wasn't sent to Guatanamo Bay.
She was radicalised on-line but then aren't all of these religious fanatics. The fact remains at an older age, she went on camera smirking at the thought of infidels being beheaded. Just a shame she wasn't sent to Guatanamo Bay.
Health Secretary Sajid Javid later told GMB that the decision had been legally and "morally right" to protect the British people.
He also disagreed with Begum's claims to have had no part in IS terrorism.
"I won't go into details of the case, but what I will say is that you certainly haven't seen what I saw," he said.
"If you did know what I knew, because you are sensible, responsible people, you would have made exactly the same decision - of that I have no doubt."
SAJID JAVIDHealth Secretary Sajid Javid later told GMB that the decision had been legally and "morally right" to protect the British people.He also disagreed with Begum's claims to have had no part in IS terrorism."I won't go into details of the case
The whole thing is ridiculous, has more to do with politics than anything else. If the girl has committed crimes against the UK then she should be brought back to face those charges in Court. If she hasn't committed any crimes then she should be allowed back.
The whole thing is ridiculous, has more to do with politics than anything else. If the girl has committed crimes against the UK then she should be brought back to face those charges in Court. If she hasn't committed any crimes then she should be allo
The whole thing is ridiculous, has more to do with politics than anything else. If the girl has committed crimes against the UK then she should be brought back to face those charges in Court. If she hasn't committed any crimes then she should be allowed back.
Bring her back? hundreds of thousands in Legal Feesin give her a slap on the wrists, couple of years at most.
And then were are you going to deport her to? Seeing as she probably has no other citizenship and no other country would take her. She would end up here on benefits for life all paid for by Daft cnts like me.
The only contribution I would be happy to make would be for the fckin Bullet.
The whole thing is ridiculous, has more to do with politics than anything else. If the girl has committed crimes against the UK then she should be brought back to face those charges in Court. If she hasn't committed any crimes then she should be allo