She's anything but a great jockey. Brings the horse nicely into the race with three to jump then unaccountably tries to send her tired horse up a rails gap that was only a 50/50 at best and which was always going to be closed by the one just in front of her. She is then forced to snatch it up, pull out to where she should have gone anyway, and runs on into second. It;s got to be a huge disappointment to connections because the horse could well have won otherwise.
Bushypark has a record last season of going PPPthen win at 50/1 and was expected to do so again last week but was just touched off at that price again i think this was the consolation prize. This time backed into favouritism . I agree Eclaire ran on well but Bushy would have taken some passing. Only my opinion of course .
Bushypark has a record last season of going PPPthen win at 50/1 and was expected to do so again last week but was just touched off at that price again i think this was the consolation prize. This time backed into favouritism . I agree Eclaire ran o
I don;t hate Bryony and I don;t love Robbie. So two out of two wrong. I defy anyone to watch the finish re-run and tell me she rode a good race on the runner up.
I don;t hate Bryony and I don;t love Robbie. So two out of two wrong.I defy anyone to watch the finish re-run and tell me she rode a good race on the runner up.
Nout to do with the fact she is a women but she is very extreme nout is simple
Whether its using the extreme inside (coming into straight and eventually switching up the middle where runs on)
Or
Absolutely hurling her mount at obstacles.
She certainly aint scared to get stuck in but for me simply isnt a top jock.
Nout to do with the fact she is a women but she is very extreme nout is simpleWhether its using the extreme inside (coming into straight and eventually switching up the middle where runs on)Or Absolutely hurling her mount at obstacles.She certainly a
Hey, Honcho's back beating the same old drum. I've missed you. That horse is always ridden like that and he was always going to be beaten by the winner. Wadham stable is woefully out of form. Nothing to do with the jockey, who is excellent.
Hey, Honcho's back beating the same old drum.I've missed you.That horse is always ridden like that and he was always going to be beaten by the winner.Wadham stable is woefully out of form. Nothing to do with the jockey, who is excellent.
He couldn't ride a rocking horse! Just a hard working journeyman. I wonder what sort of a hash the female jockey will make of this Wadham runner in the bumper? Patience must be wearing thin at Newmarket.
He couldn't ride a rocking horse! Just a hard working journeyman.I wonder what sort of a hash the female jockey will make of this Wadham runner in the bumper?Patience must be wearing thin at Newmarket.
You must have missed the good ride she gave on the lucy Wadham winner yesterday LoyalHoncho!
Nobody ever takes him up the rail into a gap that isn;t there. Can we have less of the sexual innuendo as well please!
You must have missed the good ride she gave on the lucy Wadham winner yesterday LoyalHoncho! Nobody ever takes him up the rail into a gap that isn;t there. Can we have less of the sexual innuendo as well please!
Honcho still wanting BF career to fail, even a year after the hooha. Very sad. She's still second jockey to Paul Nicholls, rides for Wadham yard, has two weekly columns, is sponsored by Aston Martin and Betfair and others etc, etc. Think she's doing OK?
Honcho still wanting BF career to fail, even a year after the hooha. Very sad.She's still second jockey to Paul Nicholls, rides for Wadham yard, has two weekly columns, is sponsored by Aston Martin and Betfair and others etc, etc.Think she's doing OK
I hope she finishes safely and gets beaten on everything - you are quite right. She very rarely if ever has my money because she is just too risky. The only reason I watched the race was because I had backed her mount to win in the match bet. It became irrelevant as the other horse failed to start. It was a ridiculous manoeuvre she made which without doubt cost her a chance of winning the race.
I hope she finishes safely and gets beaten on everything - you are quite right. She very rarely if ever has my money because she is just too risky. The only reason I watched the race was because I had backed her mount to win in the match bet. It b
Having rewatched the race, she was a inept to keep it up the inside to try to make her challenge, I would argue the gap never closed on her, the camera angle just changed
Having rewatched the race, she was a inept to keep it up the inside to try to make her challenge, I would argue the gap never closed on her, the camera angle just changed
Racing Post said the winner won "eased" down and "readily". BF did well to finish second. But we all have favourite and less favourite jockeys or trainers, so that is ok I guess.
Racing Post said the winner won "eased" down and "readily". BF did well to finish second.But we all have favourite and less favourite jockeys or trainers, so that is ok I guess.
The reason why she was so good in the first place is she would make risky (some might call it dangerous) stunts that possible broke all the unwritten rules.
That there at Plumpton (1515) is a good example of how she has lost her edge when toned it down. Lost her pitch walking up to start. Tried to rush it up hurdle 1 midfield. No good. (Not saying its her fault pulled up) but not ideal.
Probs controversial.The reason why she was so good in the first place is she would make risky (some might call it dangerous) stunts that possible broke all the unwritten rules.That there at Plumpton (1515) is a good example of how she has lost her ed
What the winner did is irrelevant. It is her tactic to go for a non-existent gap that is the issue. The winner;s brilliance, as it may be, had nothing to with that.
What the winner did is irrelevant. It is her tactic to go for a non-existent gap that is the issue. The winner;s brilliance, as it may be, had nothing to with that.