Unibet restricted me...

Are there no multi-millionaires out there who want to launch a legal challenge against this crap on grounds of discrimination?

Can keep your money in your account if u post negatives on forums,in their t and c’s

A tenner each way after five losing bets leads to a "careful review by our senior team"....    What a joke of a so called bookmaker.

i cant fathom how they make any profit if they wont take any money. are there really zillions of slotheads out there? i dont know any. i fluked a handy ppot with billys and even that counted against me. crackers.

Tattcorner…..lf l were you,bet only a fiver ew.£10 ew gets you noticed with that mob,unbelievably.

restricted 2,952 people before they decided you weren't losing quickly enough.


how many does that leave them ??

These are not Bookmakers anymore, they are all just a business with eveything on record.

If you show a profit and bet carefully i.e. picking off bonuses etc they will restrict your account.

They come out with all this crap that they want you to bet sensibly but they love the addicted gamblers that lose fortunes especially on these Casino games etc!

Skybet, Betway and BetVictor these are 3 that will bar you if you are not losing a fortune to them.

Have you noticed how they throw bonuses at losing Accounts but bar you from Promotions if you win?

Nothing but gangsters my friends!

Its about time a full and transparent inquiry took place, show the Public what they are really like and how they share your information with other firms

The trainer has been fn around for the last few seasons ever since the sponsorship with Unobet,coincidence?

A lesser developed and less richer country like Australia forbids any financial association between jockeys/trainers and bookies yet here not only these two entities are bedded together they also collude to stitch up the punters for their own benefit.

I think Mr Blair was the architect of "British" perestroika eg oligarchs with dodgy money (Abramovich) and others were allowed to buy football clubs like Chelsea and Arsenal, stately homes and other very expensive real estates in Knightsbridge and Chelsea.

Now, those from the Middle East eg the state sponsor of the murder of Mr Khashoggi in their country's consulate are allowed to go scot-free with no sanction instigated or political retribution eg no withdrawal of ambassador. Instead their wealth and money are very welcome in this country.

Interesting thread. I'm a 10 e/w punter.
PP took my promotions away a long time ago and Sky restricted me to £2.50 on boosts / promotions etc. To be fair to them, 365 haven't reined me in even though long-term profit is about £2k and I like their ITV offer. It's interesting that their chief exec was in the news for her huge profits & bonuses - maybe they do well because they take a risk and let people have a proper bet, like a real bookmaker? I'd be interested to hear if others have been barred / restricted with them.
The RP have been ranting and moaning for ages about Gambling Commission / Parliamentary scrutiny on (problem) gambling, but as others have said, it's basically a racket now and online is a gateway into slots. But the paper would fold in days without their sponsorship and it's frankly unbelievable that a trainer is allowed to be financed by a betting company. If that's not a conflict of interest, then I don't know what is.

I used to bet 10 e/w with 365 almost a decade ago, I got restricted after a few weeks. Asked them to lift the restriction 5 years later and they declined.

Differentdrum...yes, BOG and boosts withdrawn and extra places I believe...makes you want to bet elsewhere unless a standout rick in the market. Not sure about maximum takeout limit. If, say, I want £5 e/w on a 66/1 shot with Sky, a message comes up to the effect that I can only win £250 on the win side, so reduced stake shown.

I'm the same, soul of wit, with B365.  I don't do regular withdrawals and have had some good pick-ups without them panicking and they regularly give me £5 in free bets.  I know some have different experiences with them.

Hills have been quite good and no trading decisions from them.

Impossible is right.. The Aussie template is the one to follow outside of their round the clock pushing gambling on TV

If the sharp practises of the scumbag bookies are replicated on the Stock Exchange the entities would have been sanctioned ages ago eg a mega fine plus a reprimand threatening expulsion on a repetition.

The Racing Post is sh1t, and not fit for purpose; they do not represent punters or trainers but scumbag bookies - their paymaster; they turned a blind-eye to the destructive nature of fobts on the vulnerable and weak. Similarly, closure and restriction of recreational accounts.

Even now they are batting for the scumbag bookies on their unreasonable and bias usage of Affordability Check (AC) eg everyone subject to the same draconian scrutinisation instead on those clearly with an issue eg addiction or betting and/or losing huge amounts continuously with no defined mean of income or source of funds.

I support AC but the scumbag bookies need to be made to account for its application; just a bit of common sense applied for a fairer outcome for most; a more stringent one for those with a history or penchant for betting beyond their means and/or losing an unsustainable enormous amount in a short period of time.

I'd also like the Racing Post to be defunct on its present form ie funded by scumbag bookies, and a trade paper for horseracing established for the benefit of punters, trainers and owners - not bookies.

Anyone who's not restricted to tenners is a mug. They have no reason to let someone win thousands from them almost every month.

hmmm .....

365 haven't reined me in even though long-term profit is about £2k and I like their ITV offer

so you post something on here and PP know who you are.

then a few days later one of PP's bookie friends decides you're no longer entitled to their ITV offer.  the same ITV offer you said you liked.

ONE FOR THE INFORMATION COMISSIONAIRE ????  FFS

And people on here trust Paddy ??