|
By:
from the same Wikipedia article:
"two A level passes in English Literature and History with C and D grades respectively, failing his third subject, Mathematics..." |
|
By:
he has a website and gives talks about how to run business
![]() |
|
By:
Most gamblers I know are brilliant at maths.
|
|
By:
Also from the same article:
Leeson was appointed commercial manager of Galway United F.C. in April 2005, rising to the position of general manager in November 2005.[27] By July 2007 he had become the club's chief executive officer. In February 2011, after the club encountered financial problems, he resigned his position. |
|
By:
To be fair, as I understand it, he gives talks about how companies can avoid being taken for a ride by people doing what he was doing.
I was in the City for the collapse of Barings - strange times. |
|
By:
Indeed, longbridge. Poacher turned gamekeeper.
Same wiki article: He is also active on the keynote and after-dinner speaking circuit, where he advises companies about risk and corporate responsibility. |
|
By:
it's good to be a crook
|
|
By:
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/back-to-the-futures-1.32909
. Confidence and sheer chutzpah is all it takes. Nick Leeson had both in spades. Within four years he was on his way, working for Barings, the City's oldest and most patrician merchant bank. |
|
By:
Martin Gale is effective.
|
|
By:
So many failings of the central Risk function - they were told not to look too hard at the Singapore operation because it was a huge fraction of Baring's revenues, when in reality that is exactly why they should have looked.
|
|
By:
It`s a very good book too.
|
|
By:
.
|
|
By:
There are two sides to martingale,the punter and the layer,there is always a winner and a loser.The loser usually tells his story.
|
|
By:
Same wiki article:
He turned out to be a right tw@t |
|
By:
system working well.
please send me another US$835 million so i can meet my margin obligations. ok, Nick. well done, monies on it's way. |
|
By:
@test..
Nearly two years late on this but.. "it's good to be a crook" I don't think he was really a crook in the direct sense. He wasn't taking money to personally embezzle (though you could argue that his pay was inflated by the results he claimed). He seems to have been mainly motivated by one or both of (a) maintaining a reputation as a wunderkind player in the eyes of his peers (b) a sense of responsibility in that the revenues of the Far East operation were seen as key in keeping Barings profitable in a period when their UK and European businesses were stalling or worse. |