|
By:
Surely and stewards, not 2 words that go together
|
|
By:
for what?
|
|
By:
For impeding every runner in the race.
|
|
By:
Interfering with a fair few osses.
|
|
By:
I suppose it could be thrown out for drifting from one rail to another and hampering or intimidating about 6 horses .
|
|
By:
VinylStar 17 Apr 21 15:25
For impeding every runner in the race. you must have been watching a diff race to me. |
|
By:
Naw Whilst I would not wager, he will keep and a nice ban to follow up, wonder what the betting is on it
|
|
By:
None of the hampered horses were in the first half dozen, how can they throw it out?
|
|
By:
its hmp 2 that were unplaced and one of them has slightly hmp another.
|
|
By:
As soon as it drifted he changed his whip hand and tried to correct it.
|
|
By:
You didn't see the jockey nearly fall off as a consequence of his rider not doing enough to straighten winner out.
|
|
By:
RS and ban surely
|
|
By:
He did try, not easy if they keep drifting imo
|
|
By:
No change 5lb claimer gets a holiday....
|
|
By:
it isnt dangerous..nc of being placed behind the 2nd and 3rd...
cannot poss get disq. |
|
By:
Could not help my self backed at 1.07/1.08 to keep and laid off @ 1.05 small profit for free whatever happens
|
|
By:
Aren't rules slightly different in Ireland?
|
|
By:
we will soon see stew..
![]() |
|
By:
result stands.
|
|
By:
As long as the result stands every time more than half the field is impeded by 1 idiot then that's ok.
|
|
By:
Never in doobt.
|
|
By:
its hmp 2 that were unplaced and one of them has slightly hmp another.
VinylStar |