|
By:
wow thats a turn up and surely they now have control over his actions and outspoken anti gambling ? money talks and the gambling industry have many mps under there belt as its a multi millions pounds they need to protect
|
|
By:
Anyone got a sick bucket.?
![]() |
|
By:
I thought he was pro-responsible gambling as opposed to "anti-gambling" though I wouldn't expect the daily fail to tell the truth.
|
|
By:
Being an anti Corbyn man was far more important to the ordinary person than his views on responsible betting or whatever.
|
|
By:
Wonder what huge salary this non job will pay him for this part time work, together with his salary for his expertise in the music industry.
|
|
By:
Not at all surprised.
A guy who has no principles whatsoever. |
|
By:
Aye, MP's all the same, gravy and more gravy.
|
|
By:
The guardian says he is understood to being paid a retainer of £100,000.This coming on the same day that Chris Grayling was reported to have accepted a position as an advisor to a port company,again for £100,000.
Absolutely unbelievable,you could not make this up. |
|
By:
If I were a shareholder in one of these companies I might be concerned about an individuals salary but otherwise I couldn't care less what they pay people as long as they paid their taxes properly and in full.
|
|
By:
It is possible that he could use his new position to influence for good. I would love to see his contract and whether it contains a gagging clause.
|
|
By:
After his role in the paedo ring nonsense the bloke should retire to the country & be thankful he wasn’t sued to high heaven.some front these politicians.
|
|
By:
Gamekeeper turned poacher. I wonder if the remuneration was responsible for this decision. If so, money does talk; can't beat them, join them!
|
|
By:
When he looks at the small print he'll find out that they are paying him in free bets.
|
|
By:
A betting firm that owns pp and sb, lol, pp shareholders own 52% of bf, did a simple name change alter that? They done it for the munee, run out of ire (the EU lol lol lol) for reduced corporate tax?
Sorry to diverse,but yea it's a murkey old lark innit. |
|
By:
flutter also owns the stars group and skybet - there is no such thing as "pp shareholders" and hasn't been for years.
|
|
By:
What a sell out
|
|
By:
We hear yer
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
A cosy position similar but not as lucrative as Mr Nick Clegg, the former leader of the Liberal Party. I'm sure Mr Watson could have sat on committees or entities not conducive to bookies to retain his independence, objectivity and impartiality. But, hey...money talks.
|
|
By:
Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.
Sun Tzu ![]() |
|
By:
But this is not party politics or hierarchy in a major plc corporation. It's only a bookmaking entity who stole zillions from fobt addicts and did very little to its negative consequences.
|
|
By:
Did he ever apologise for his actions?
Greville Janner Lord Bramall Leon Brittan A sl*meball of the highest order. |
|
By:
i thought he was one of the biggest critics of gambling and curbing fobts and his name always seemed to be behind the push to regulate it more ? lets pay someone a big salary and calm his output, oh it stinks
|
|
By:
Curbing FOBT's is a bad thing in your tiny mind?
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
just to clarify - his role is meant to be a safer gambling expert of some kind. However, it is only his arrogance that makes him think he has £100k's worth of expertise in this matter. There will be dozens of actual experts in this area that understand exactly the issues that lead to damaging addiction and whose advice will be ignored.
|
|
By:
Richie_Burnett 18 Sep 20 13:02
Sep 18, 2020 -- 12:30PM, Davy Jones wrote: What a sell out How is it selling out? It's merely an continuation of what he was doing in the commmons - but in/funded by the private sector. He is obviously infinitely more qualified for this role than Grayling is for the shipping one. Normal Labourite double standards with a twist of whataboutery, great stuff. |
|
By:
Flutter may be cleaning out their house, but until there is industry wide agreement, policy and regulation, they are only shifting the problem elsewhere.
Betting companies are paying lip service to this debacle, in the hope that it appeases those with wider agendas. This appointment probably being a case in point. Old Chinese proverb - Better to throw the pigeon a few crumbs than let him eat your loaf. The whole thing smacks of hypocrisy. |
|
By:
Just a reminder that this is where your commission is going.
![]() |
|
By:
I'd rather pay commission than go back to bookmaker type betting thank you.
|
|
By:
Mr Watson taking up a position within Flutter only reinforces the general view that bookies or any entity will do their utmost to prevent/thwart any radical changes that could be in the pipeline on the present betting/gaming policies/licences; like to be seen to be doing something positive.
Many moons ago I used to be involved with carrying out outreach work and methodology studies for councils and a few private entities. But, each time a report was made and presented measures recommended esp councils would always ask for a waterdown version so as not to impact negatively on their funding sources. As such, nothing significantly positive ever achieved ie the infestation/rot remained. |
|
By:
I'd rather pay less commission and see Tom Watson in the dole queue, ta very much.
|
|
By:
Well that's a clever one, screaming.
Ingenious no less. |
|
By:
saddo, please stop embarrassing yourself - it really is quite unnecessary.
I'm not a Labour voter and I deliberately did not mention Grayling first. |