|
By:
so if a book didn't want to go 9/2 the 4/1 shot.....
And they say comedy is dead! ![]() |
|
By:
For decimal odds to work to work 9/2 is 5.5 and 4/1 is 5.0 evens is 2 etc.
However there is zero chance of oncourse bookmakers displaying odds that are more open and attractive to their customers' they would much rather confound them with 19/5 17/5 13/5 85/40 21/20 etc and everything in between |
|
By:
^ Odds on shots would look ridiculous on the racecourse. Imagine showing a horse at 0.73!
|
|
By:
5.1,5.2,5.3, 5.4,5.5 much more attractive than 4/1,or you have a line of books all displaying the same price 4/1 and one on the back row going 9/2. Give your customers the choice.
|
|
By:
I remember years ago at Ascot jeff Banks going decimal for the day,
he was back to normal the next day I think h said the punters did not want decimal betting. have a good day regards Ronnie. |
|
By:
Not a proper experiment if ONLY 1 book participates,and you got the impression they didn't want it to work.
Anyone that thinks a customer understands fractions better than decimals doesn't know their punters very well. Jmdc,why would it be ridiculous showing odds at under 1,like you stated at .73? Customers would know that £10 wins £7.30,far easier than trying to explain what 8/11 means,and working out 8/11 to £10. Meanwhile let them all stay in the past,8 halfcrowns to the pound! |
|
By:
I don't think they know much about decimal points on the racecourse unbiased. The blind wouldn't see it, and the devious would ignore it.
|
|
By:
I don't think they know much about decimal points on the racecourse unbiased. The blind wouldn't see it, and the devious would ignore it.
|
|
By:
good point regards working out returns by unbiased,but to those just backing the horse regardless of price ,returns are shown on the ticket anyway
|