Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
sparrow
04 Oct 19 12:12
Joined:
Date Joined: 20 Jul 02
| Topic/replies: 57,982 | Blogger: sparrow's blog
Former champion jump jockey Tom Morgan has dismissed the significance of an 18-month disqualification against him for laying horses to lose while employed as stable staff – claiming instead he was being made a "scapegoat" as part of a greater BHA investigation.

However, the sport’s governing body insisted the ban showed the importance of strong penalties around lay betting by registered individuals due to the "damage such practices do to the integrity of British racing and the confidence of the racing and betting public".

Morgan, 56, admitted at a disciplinary panel hearing on Thursday to placing 137 lay bets on horses trained by David Wintle and Richard Phillips, during a ten-year period when employed by the pair from September 2006 to October 2016, for a total profit of £1,720.

The one-time leading rider, who was top jockey at the 1989 Cheltenham Festival, was found to have broken the rules on two occasions, firstly between November 1, 2005 and December 19, 2008 and then between September 16, 2013 and October 28, 2016.

His betting activity, which was described as being loss-making overall, took place on Betfair under his own name and was heavily skewed towards lay bets with them accounting for 8,847 of his 11,063 wagers during the investigated period.

The illegitimate lay bets came to light when BHA investigators were trawling betting data provided by the exchange under the memorandum of understanding between the firm and racing’s regulator as part of what was described as a "deep and complex" investigation into another inquiry. Morgan is not part of that inquiry.

Morgan, whose big-race wins included the 1988 Queen Mother Champion Chase on Pearlyman, said: "[The inquiry] had to take its course and that’s it but how I ended up here is beyond belief. I was 40 when it happened and I’m 56 now – I can’t even describe the frustration.

"They wanted somebody and they’ve got me. I’m a scapegoat in the course of another investigation. They’re the regulators and they have to regulate but it’s ridiculous. There’s a lot of anger [I’m feeling] too. It’s petty from them."

The BHA would not comment further on the investigation which was raised in Thursday’s hearing and involved "huge amounts of betting data", according to Andrew Howell, the BHA’s head of regulation.

He added: "It was in November 2016 when Mr Morgan’s betting activity came to the attention of the BHA. That was part of a different investigation that was ongoing at that point of time.

"It was part of a supporting investigation into a deep and complex separate investigation. Mr Morgan was charged in February 2019 and it is our acceptance that the delay was not in his control."

Morgan, who is not currently in work due to a hip injury, was registered as an employed head lad for the late David Wintle and as a part-time employee for Phillips, which involved driving horses to the races and for which he received no remuneration.

The former jockey has yet to decide whether to appeal his ban, which was imposed with immediate effect and runs until April 2, 2021, and said: "The rule says you need to be employed and I feel I wasn’t employed. It’s a technicality they’ve got me on – that’s it. For me the word ‘employed’ means to be paid and their view of that is different because they say it’s when you’re working for somebody; I was never working for anybody, I was just helping out.

"It’s my life we’re talking about here, but they want to regulate like this. All I’d say to anyone is that if they ask you to sign the stable register then don’t. That’s the only advice I can give to anyone.”

The BHA reiterated the obligations of registered stable staff in abiding by the rules of racing regardless of whether they are paid or not for their work.

A spokesman said: "Mr Morgan was subject to a fair hearing in front of an independent disciplinary panel. Those who enter on to the Stable Employee Register have to actively agree to be bound by the rules of racing, irrespective of the financial arrangements of their employment, and it is their ongoing responsibility to ensure they are familiar with the rules.

"Penalties in relation to lay betting by registered personnel are considerable due to the damage such practices do to the integrity of British racing and the confidence of the racing and betting public, who these rules are in place to protect."

Morgan, who shared the Irish jump jockeys’ title with Frank Berry in 1985-1986, stated he felt embarrassed by the judgement, and added: "What do you do now? I’ll do the same as I always do in that I’ll watch the racing, have a bet or a back to lay and that’s what I’ve always been doing."

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 47
By:
know all
When: 04 Oct 19 12:24
The most interesting part is hidden right at the bottom

Weight issues forced Morgan into premature retirement in 1991 aged just 28, after which he ran a London pub before taking roles with Graham McCourt, David Wintle and Richard Phillips.

He also appeared as an expert witness for former trainer Jim Best at his 2016 disciplinary panel hearing.

It said its part of a major investigation and he was a name during that not yet resolved investigation, his name popped up i think there will be a lot more to come and looks like he has been dragged into this while theyre seriously after others ? clever of the post to leave a clue or two
By:
sageform
When: 04 Oct 19 13:48
Hardly a big scandal if he lost money during his betting life. He had a couple of good seasons for John Edwards and has struggled to make a living since apparently. He broke the rules but didn't profit from it.
By:
ribero1
When: 04 Oct 19 13:52
He obviously considers it revenge for helping Best's defence in 2016,nothing to see really as we all know its an everyday occurrence and occasionally the authorities throw a few scraps to the wolves.
By:
dave1357
When: 04 Oct 19 14:17

Oct 4, 2019 -- 1:48PM, sageform wrote:


Hardly a big scandal if he lost money during his betting life. He had a couple of good seasons for John Edwards and has struggled to make a living since apparently. He broke the rules but didn't profit from it.


The report states that he won money on the illegal bets

By:
sageform
When: 04 Oct 19 14:44
Some of them but he lost on many others. They will always highlight out the ones that won (or lost in this caseHappy).
By:
posy
When: 04 Oct 19 14:58
Was he really top jock at Cheltenham ; I can barely remember him.
By:
sparrow
When: 04 Oct 19 15:02
posy 04 Oct 19 14:58 
Was he really top jock at Cheltenham ; I can barely remember him.




Tom Morgan, 56, was one of the leading riders of the 1980s, a period in which he was champion jump jockey in Ireland and top jockey at the Cheltenham Festival.

He shared the jockeys’ title with Frank Berry at the end of the 1985-86 season before moving to Britain in 1987 where he linked up successfully with trainer John Edwards, including when capturing the 1988 Queen Mother Champion Chase on Pearlyman.

Morgan, who also claimed big-race wins in the 1982 Supreme Novices’ Hurdle on Miller Hill, 1988 Eider Chase on Star Of Screen and 1989 Cathcart Chase on Observer Corps, was the leading rider at the 1989 Cheltenham Festival, the same year he partnered Yahoo to finish second behind the great Desert Orchid in the Cheltenham Gold Cup.

Weight issues forced Morgan into premature retirement in 1991 aged just 28, after which he ran a London pub before taking roles with Graham McCourt, David Wintle and Richard Phillips. He also appeared as an expert witness for former trainer Jim Best at his 2016 disciplinary panel hearing.
By:
posy
When: 04 Oct 19 15:04
Thank you sparrow;my memory is certainly not what it once was
By:
sixtwosix
When: 04 Oct 19 15:27
He rode the great Pearlyman and Yahoo , he was a top jockey in that era.
By:
mrcombustible
When: 04 Oct 19 15:37
I think he rode for Dessie Hughes in Ireland before coming to UK, may have had a brother that rode K Morgan.

My memory is not great
By:
fronter
When: 04 Oct 19 16:28
Rode a lot for John Edwards, think Venetia Williams may have been at the stable at the time.
By:
Marathon Man
When: 04 Oct 19 16:32
SSR just issued apology that they incorrectly named jockey as Tom Malone!
By:
jinxy
When: 04 Oct 19 16:33
Be surprised if most jocks/trainers were not laying horses , much easier to provide a loser than a winner ,  .... Betting exchanges  too open to abuse by the pure nature of them ...... Most average joe punter much better off if we had just one tote , imo :-)
By:
sageform
When: 04 Oct 19 17:13
Of course laying is a way for professionals to make money but to think that exchanges made it much easier is false. All you had to do before exchanges was have a quiet word with a bookmaker or even shake your head and he would reward you for a sure loser. No way that could be detected unless the bookie spilled the beans.
By:
sageform
When: 04 Oct 19 17:17
The real difference is in running. When Betfair started betting in running I mentioned it to a trainer who used to ride for Fred Rimell. He told me that Fred told him that he could have made a fortune if in running betting was allowed as a good trainer can see within a few furlongs if their horse is on form. Trainers are not allowed to now of course???
By:
sparrow
When: 04 Oct 19 17:22
Read William Hill's biography and find out all about laying non starters before the exchanges.
By:
impossible123
When: 04 Oct 19 17:29
I hope The BHA have not forgotten the'laying' of Douvan, Vautour, Faugheen, Melon and Yorkhill at Closutton stable. And, I'm 100% certain someone/entity with inside info made a significant sum of money 'laying' these horses as every one of them ran a pants race or did not take part at all.
By:
MJK
When: 04 Oct 19 17:41
He has the inside track and only made 1700 quid. Not very good at it was he.
By:
breadnbutter
When: 04 Oct 19 17:54
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Hsau32l_vYI
By:
breadnbutter
When: 04 Oct 19 17:55
As bad a punter as a jockey ,bet he has been on the forum slavering sheet for years
By:
carrot1960
When: 04 Oct 19 18:12
The crook got caught end off, and as for his advice of dont sign the stable register and your all right LaughLaughLaugh
By:
TOP3MAN
When: 04 Oct 19 18:29
Whose to say they don’t tell their mates to lay em
By:
ribero1
When: 04 Oct 19 19:01
Sageform,absolute nonsense saying everyone went to a bookie to lay them before the exchanges,obviously there will have been occasions when this happened but nothing has gone on with the exchanges,dream on.
By:
ribero1
When: 04 Oct 19 19:02
Sorry should have read nothing like what has gone on with the exchanges.
By:
11kv
When: 04 Oct 19 19:07
All the lower tier jocks have putter oners ,its the only way to survive....
By:
truehoncho
When: 04 Oct 19 19:30
Why don't they open accounts in friends/accomplice's name?
By:
impossible123
When: 04 Oct 19 20:16
When there's a will, there is a way similarly for Betfair too. If Betfair are genuinely keen on fighting this fraud just follow the money, unless Betfair put commission before integrity and responsibility. This fraud can only continue for a short time if Betfair have the will to stop it.
By:
sparrow
When: 04 Oct 19 20:42
The idea that these practices will be mostly eliminated if Betfair clamped down on them is ridiculous. Skulduggery in racing has been going on since time immemorial and I would argue that it was even worse when I started betting regularly in the 1960s with widespread doping etc.
By:
breadnbutter
When: 04 Oct 19 21:16
The doping in the 90s of Norwich and Bravefoot ect was allowed to go on imo ,the game was shown to be corrupt to the core . Was a disgusting episode and not many said anything ,Big Mac had plenty to say but he was swimming against a tsunami .
By:
foxy
When: 04 Oct 19 21:27
You would struggle to lay place only to a bookmaker
By:
sageform
When: 04 Oct 19 21:28
ribero I didn't say everybody but the big bookmakers had staff who got inside info from most big yards. If a trainer backed his own horse they knew it was trying and the price was wiped off pretty fast. My point was that there was absolutely no traceability in those days and it was not even against the rules but now racing professionals are not allowed to bet on exchanges or anywhere else. I was a very small owner in the eighties and nineties and bet on the rails but the bookies knew which yard I had my horses with and so did other punters. I remember one day at Towcester when my horse was strongly fancied. I backed it with a bookmaker I knew and told him it would probably win so drop the price. After it did win I had a chat with him and he was not happy as a pro punter followed me in with a bigger bet before he could wipe the price! If you are seen in the paddock with a fancied horse and then have a bet you will probably pick up a tail. It was ever thus.
By:
foxy
When: 04 Oct 19 21:31
Breadnbutter

Did you know bravefoot finished his racing career in a 2 mile chase on heavy ground at Tipperary.
By:
ribero1
When: 04 Oct 19 21:53
No worries sageform,trainers no doubt still bet with bookmakers today who get their card marked,the ability to lay horses to lose has opened up an altogether different income stream for anyone with inside information nowadays,personally I don't have a particular problem with it as have got used to it.
By:
chavman
When: 04 Oct 19 22:08
I backed it with a bookmaker I knew and told him it would probably win so drop the price

im really struggling to find any sense or rational behaviour in this
By:
breadnbutter
When: 04 Oct 19 23:02
What do you fancy in Arc caveman ?
By:
breadnbutter
When: 04 Oct 19 23:02
*chaveman
By:
breadnbutter
When: 04 Oct 19 23:03
*chavman
By:
breadnbutter
When: 04 Oct 19 23:03
Sorry old sport
By:
breadnbutter
When: 04 Oct 19 23:03
ffs
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com