Jul 23, 2019 -- 8:53PM, hulk23 wrote:
denzil went round to o'farrell's to collect his winnings then into the boozer for a few pints on his way home from primary school ... them were the days
It was attached to a social club hulk my old man barred me from both til I was 18 and didn't take the pi$$ cos they knew who I was,fortunately there were 5 other pubs and a bookies within a 200 metre radius to fill the gap from about 15/16-18 and my mates were a couple of years older so never had much bother.
Only got caught out once by a barmaid who knew my exact age turned out I was in the first class she looked after at Nursery school but she didn't shop me.


At Oldgit. Brilliant! Kids today eh, don't know how lucky they are with their privacy!
Jul 23, 2019 -- 10:32AM, Aladdin Sane wrote:
Betting is supposed to be about risk. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. That used to apply to both punter and “turf accountant”.Today’s off course Bookmakers have decided that they must never lose, and winning is a divine right.They have been allowed to control FAR too much in both horse racing and greyhound racing and, in my opinion, both sports have suffered because of it..
This exactly sums up the industry, as things stand.
Nobody willing to stand up from the rest for the fear of losing. I appreciate everything has it's price (and liability) but it's surely gone too far when there's a fear of a repeat of Frankies 7. These guys should know the true odds of that ever reoccurring and I mean ever.
A firm who truly embraces the practice of standing behind their prices and taking bets, heaven forbid a bookmakers firm doing such a thing, would surely force the hand of the other firms to follow suit, if it was proven that customers were leaving them to go elsewhere.
There's still millions in profit to be made regardless of the small percentile who win, to varying degrees granted.
). If anyone swore the manager would ask them to leave the shop. How times have changed.