There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Whys it been called?
Market on the specials page, no liquidity
Market on the specials page, no liquidity
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 50
|
By:
1.04 to keep, didn't look involved
|
|
By:
Cant involve the 1st & 2nd.
|
|
By:
3rd hampered 2nd, race ridden in
|
|
By:
Revised result.
|
|
By:
1st past post NOT the winner
|
|
By:
I cannot believe that was amended, I'm stunned.
|
|
By:
 stoords |
|
By:
Unbelievable Jeff
|
|
By:
Shocking decision.
|
|
By:
Saw the bumping and took a small risk in the photo
Not sure what's happening. RUK is useless Kyllukey * 98.89 4.50 Back |
|
By:
Also a Stuarts at Limerick I gather.
|
|
By:
were the stewards inebriated and got the two blue and white colours mixed up.
|
|
By:
possibly worst decision ever
|
|
By:
must've been a huge 1.01 gubbing there
 |
|
By:
Worst decision in a very long time.
|
|
By:
I've watched the race and head on 5 or 6 times, it is an absolutely disgraceful decision to amend the result. It truly does beggar belief that happened.
|
|
By:
that surely must have finished a few people off - must have been massive 1.01 and seen 300 to 500's on kylukey when photo was opened. Crazy decision - worst ive seen.
|
|
By:
Wow
Kyllukey * 98.89 4.50 Back 440.50 |
|
By:
I cant believe it.
|
|
By:
What planet are the stewards on exactly? The appeal will overturn that incredulous decision.
|
|
By:
Thomas Evetts (Chief Steward), Anthony Webber (Stewards' Panel Chair), Anthony
McGlone (Steward), Bethany Dowswell (Assistant Steward). every one of them fookers should never work in racing again |
|
By:
the only way they could have come to that decision is if they had mopped up the huge prices!!!
|
|
By:
I feel like I've been robbed there.
|
|
By:
One word CRAZY
I never bet in Stewards because years ago at Newmarket where the horse that finished second was murdered and I backed it to get the race and they let the result stand. Never again you just can not trust them to get it right. I really feel sorry for the punters who lost there money you could put you off the game forever when that sort of thing happens. |
|
By:
no consolation .
But you have. Rubs salt in the wounds when it gets turned over @ appeal. |
|
By:
just seen..going inside the last the original winner has drifted 2foot into the 2nd path and jockey has momentarily checked..its beat a rapidly diminishing nose so can see why its been disq.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
did my eyes deceive me or was the promoted winner 170 in the fota?
|
|
By:
he was bigger than that george
|
|
By:
Nearly threw £2 at it RL but changed my mind
 |
|
By:
the problem is george and it applies to most..
photo backers can miss things that arnt blatant and bet as if nothing untoward. |
|
By:
290 was the biggest price I got, but it may have been bigger at one stage
Kyllukey 290.00 0.40 Back 11-Apr-19 17:16 |
|
By:
same here
i got my luck at newcastle tho so im all happy just wish he won  |
|
By:
Indeed Willie, market usually adjusts when there's a suspicion of a SE, but not this time
WD Poppydog |
|
By:
@george
|
|
By:
Nice one Poppydog.
|
|
By:
over 3k done at 1.03 to keep the race after im sure they had seen the replay even ireland would of been hard pressed to kick out the winner
 |
|
By:
I'm a Chelmsford steward so all I do is wait until the race finishes, my mate is on the phone. I know that following the photo the steward's enquiry will follow I only need a few seconds for my mate to bet on the second horse and lay the winner.. from what I can see I made 15K on the race!
|