Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
stewarts rise
16 Mar 19 19:20
Joined:
Date Joined: 22 Apr 04
| Topic/replies: 34,111 | Blogger: stewarts rise's blog
iyo?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 28
By:
par
When: 16 Mar 19 19:21
it should be lobbed out that, weaved all over place n stopped the 2nd in its run
By:
Wesdag
When: 16 Mar 19 19:22
mrkt re-opened
By:
aypee
When: 16 Mar 19 19:22
Has to be a stewards I agree 2nd was cost race
By:
LazyPete
When: 16 Mar 19 19:22
Didn't look good tbh
By:
Flagship2
When: 16 Mar 19 19:23
I backed Gurkha at 1000 in case it finished second and winner is placed behind Executive....could this happen?
By:
Flagship2
When: 16 Mar 19 19:24
Seemingly not as it finished 3rd lol
By:
par
When: 16 Mar 19 19:25
big Simon thinks its nothing to do with the winner, deary deary me
By:
tomhunt
When: 16 Mar 19 19:26
could easily go, winning distance nose
By:
RacingLuck
When: 16 Mar 19 19:26
3rd getting it Crazy
By:
posy
When: 16 Mar 19 19:27
flagship...you could easily cover
By:
PENLLWYN
When: 16 Mar 19 19:27
how can the 3rd get it ?
By:
chavman
When: 16 Mar 19 19:27
i think he first veered and stopped a fast closing mythical madness,whether intentional or not who knows.

should be amended given he stopped executive and only beat it a nose
By:
stewarts rise
When: 16 Mar 19 19:28
Has to go if it's just a nose!
By:
LazyPete
When: 16 Mar 19 19:28
Should be slung really but UK stewards so useless in these instances I'd not be surprised. Checked, stopped riding yet only lost a nose. Should be a formality but probs keep the race
By:
Flagship2
When: 16 Mar 19 19:29
Sorry Penllwyn - thought when they past the post it has finished second, then checked the result. It weas definitely second at the first winning post lol
By:
Keefter
When: 16 Mar 19 19:29
on Gurka at 1000 - letting it run - this is an interesting one.
By:
Flagship2
When: 16 Mar 19 19:31
Wish it would have just held on for second now...
By:
stewarts rise
When: 16 Mar 19 19:32
Got it right for once!
By:
tons of sobs
When: 16 Mar 19 19:32
thrown outCool
By:
granitjack
When: 16 Mar 19 19:32
Quite right as well.
By:
LazyPete
When: 16 Mar 19 19:33
Thank fook
By:
chavman
When: 16 Mar 19 19:33
cant argue with that
By:
PENLLWYN
When: 16 Mar 19 19:34
Really
By:
LazyPete
When: 16 Mar 19 19:35
Talking through my pocket a bit but that's the right call. No way FPP wins without the interference so clearly a fair call
By:
PENLLWYN
When: 16 Mar 19 20:24
i tried to look at it through a stewards eyes Laugh
By:
blunder
When: 17 Mar 19 14:55
How did they bet on the stewards please somebody,watched the replay and I would have backed it to get slung .Switched off at 6.05
,watching the England rugby debacle cost me.
By:
stewarts rise
When: 17 Mar 19 15:30
I initially layed Salute the Soldier at 1.1 in the photo with the expectation of a stewards being called, and it was long odds on immediately after stewards was announced, with Mappletoft suggesting that the stewards probably concerned something happening behind the winner, i backed it back at 1.54. Executive Force which i thought would get the race i backed at 3.1 5 mins later and once they had shown the head on backed again at 1.91 another 4 mins later.
By:
blunder
When: 17 Mar 19 16:08
Thanks stewarts , looks like I missed an early Christmas ,that looked about a 1.2 chance to me ,admittedly not having seen the head on.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com