There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
https://www.racenet.com.au/news/us-judge-makes-photo-error---trainer-calls-it-rotten-20190306
What do you think?
Top picture - Normal PHOTO
Bottom picture - Reverse/Mirror Image.
What do you think?
Top picture - Normal PHOTO
Bottom picture - Reverse/Mirror Image.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 93
|
By:
in both pics - the far side one seems to have a nose that disappears, poor quality photo
|
|
By:
Never ever trusted photos..i know a few have been overturned/reversed in the past..
|
|
By:
Never ever trusted photos..i know a few have been overturned/reversed in the past..
|
|
By:
Never ever trusted photos..i know a few have been overturned/reversed in the past..
|
|
By:
Never ever trusted photos..i know a few have been overturned/reversed in the past..
|
|
By:
Never ever trusted photos..i know a few have been overturned/reversed in the past..
|
|
By:
what the hell happened there?
|
|
By:
did you fall asleep on the return button ?
|
|
By:
i dont know but i have a feeling he may never have trusted photos
|
|
By:
"Never ever trusted photos..i know a few have been overturned/reversed in the past."
Pressure from Shafty&co  |
|
By:
Was sneezing...
BHA Adds Result Verification Procedure Thursday, July 5, 2018 at 6:25 am | Back to: Europe, Shared News Previous Story | Next Story The British Horseracing Authority has instituted an additional results verification procedure after a wrong result was posted at Kempton in March. In that instance, an official result was later reversed after a photo finish was more closely examined and the result found to be incorrect. The process, which has been trialled extensively since March, means that an additional line of verification is now in place before the ‘weighed in’ signal is given, whereby the stipendiary stewards on duty are required to verify the finishing order of the winning and placed horses. Should there be a query, a signal is given to the judge on duty to revisit the result until there is agreement between both parties, in which case the provisional result may be amended if it has been given. Brant Dunshea, chief regulatory officer of the BHA, said, “Although the initial situation which caused us to look into results verification was disappointing, the outcome whereby all those affected by the result of a race can have increased confidence in its accuracy is a positive one. I’d like to thank all those who have been involved in the process both within the BHA and externally for their assistance in completing this project, which is now in place for all races run in Great Britain.” Some real clever shoites on here. |
|
By:
Anybody want to put sunglass man up again.?...?
|
|
By:
VISIONARY THREAD
The FORUM strike again !    |
|
By:
Okay we accept that mistakes can be made, after all we're all only human.
Jockeys mistake winning post & get a lengthy ban, how long ban will the incompetent judge be given? (and will he be warned to his future conduct?) |
|
By:
Short delay to next race - Judge nipping out to Specsavers
 |
|
By:
Judge is probably studying the photo for the current race, taken as they passed the post for the first time!
|
|
By:
Should have used VAR
|
|
By:
Here is the Judge.
[ This image is no longer available. ] |
|
By:
stewards & judges bar closed till 5pm
|
|
By:
Was it Felix Wheeler? Surely a long ban if so (he has previous)
|
|
By:
Judge: Paul Champion.
|
|
By:
So why do we have two winning posts any way and why not put a cover on the one that isn’t used
|
|
By:
Thanks
|
|
By:
Because, Doncaster, those things are too obvious. We Brits like to be difficult!
|
|
By:
LAdbrokes & Betway paying out on both results
|
|
By:
even worse for my L31
1 loser, 7/1 winner 5/1 winner ami to come at 5/1 bog and time for rosie 12/1 would have been arghhhhh :( |
|
By:
365 arent :(
typical |
|
By:
I wonder if it had been a short head win for OFR whether the "mistake" would ever have been noticed
|
|
By:
365 might be about to payout, the place money has gone and bet now as unsettled :)
|
|
By:
skybet paid out
|
|
By:
bet 365 paid out too :)
got an ew L31 12/1 7/1 5/1 winners and a loser and ami in next at sandown 5/1 obv the above all bog prices :) |
|
By:
Good luck MaleUK!
|
|
By:
bugger
50p ew L31 so £31 paid £470, but would have been over £2,500 :( thats racing. |
|
By:
Does anybody know which firms paid out on both results?
|
|
By:
should stop boys being stewards
and judge being on the drink what a mess |
|
By:
I think that Bookies should not pay out until 'Weighed in' is announced'
|
|
By:
Surely was going to happen sometime.
|
|
By:
It was the only race I saw live today as I was visiting my son who is a rugby fan. I marked off Third Wind as winner in my RP and could not believe the call from the judge. It was only later that I read what happened. What puzzles me is why the camera on the first line was switched on?
I have very good reason to hate those two posts. I once owned a share in a horse called Jefferies who passed the first post a half length up and then pulled himself up despite the frantic effort of Norman Williamson to keep him going. He was beaten a short head at the second post. I laugh when I read that horses don't know where the line is. Of course they do if they have run a few times. It is where the jockey stops riding them out and using the whip! |
|
By:
sageform
Absolutely, why was the camera on the chase course switched on? That camera was useless until the chase at 3.35. |