|
By:
ok
|
|
By:
The odds on shot in the seller appeared to be injured, didn't it?
|
|
By:
dus that matter
![]() |
|
By:
Race 5 - 4:35pm
THE LOCAL PARKING SECURITY SELLING HURDLE RACE (CLASS 5) Following the race the Veterinary Officer reported that IMPULSIVE AMERICAN, which was pulled up, was lame left fore. |
|
By:
Dont suppose you backed it mate did you?
|
|
By:
no
|
|
By:
Apparently it was lame Barton but they had an odds last week that was lame also. I don't think it's that hard for a jockey to make a slight mistake and pull the horse up oh dear it's lame wtf. We are been screwed mate every ferkin day, wouldn't have looked so obvious if the bag of **** hadn't won at 16/1. Smell the coffee. Why arent the stewards asking questions was the horse inspected by a vet? Etc etc
|
|
By:
Following the race the Veterinary Officer reported that IMPULSIVE AMERICAN, which was pulled up, was lame left fore.
|
|
By:
Thanx delta but it was probably wrong before it ferkin ran. I didn't back it btw but been suspicious of these kernes for a long time. Little bit odd how they have two heavily backed shorties go lame in a week but that still doesn't explain the rag winning pu last time winning at 16/1 should set some ferkin bells ringing or is it ok to be bent
|
|
By:
Sorry thanks andy
|
|
By:
andyl, 5 mins behind
amazing scenes |
|
By:
Lol,delta
|
|
By:
Andy were there any excuses for the rag winning?
|
|
By:
And thanx delta again just got u lol
|
|
By:
andy was reiterating.
|
|
By:
rags wen every day dave..
|
|
By:
I know Andy and how ferkin annoying is it. Just didn't like the way it looked today and it's been a regular pattern for pipe last few years but then he's not the only one is he? Think Johnston had 2 decent prices yesterday and a losing 5/4 !!!! And don't get me on fahey omg he's just as bad
|
|
By:
There's nothing wrong with a bit of cynicism but what does the stable winning another race with a big priced horses have to do with that horse pulling up? I don't get it.
|
|
By:
nixy
|
|
By:
Thought it was quite obvious Barton the old conspiracy theory. Too many of their odds on finishe last or pull up but yet a bag of **** that pulled up last time wins at 16/1 surely that sets alarm bells ringing and the stewards should be asking way more questions. Personally I feel all losing faves that finish tailed off should be inquired too.
|
|
By:
I hope these figures are of some interest: In all chases and hurdle races since the beginning of 2008, where the horse was pulled up last time out, 2450 from 39505 have won next time, which is 6.2% . Over the same period, the figure for D E Pipe's runners, which have done the same is 48 winners from 358 runners, which is 13.41%...more than double the average.
|
|
By:
Are Jonjo's figures above average?
|
|
By:
Jonjo's 53 from 529 @ 10.02%
|
|
By:
If the OP was on to something, surely the rag that won would have been well backed instead of drifting 100% from its opening price with the books?
|
|
By:
This game`s not for you.
|
|
By:
Original poster might be on to something. Not sure when David Pipe took over from his father, but I ran pu last time from 2008, chases and hurdles for David in the software I use and got the following:
Runners: 363 winners: 48 strike rate: 13.22% p/l BSP (commission 5%): +137.37 ROI: 37.84% A Chi score of 12.11 suggest thses figures aren't down to luck. Thanks davethehat for highlighting this, I shall add it to my list of NH systems. |