There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
wots boga reckon?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 46
|
By:
looked like it might have edged into 2nd
|
|
By:
one thread only ta
|
|
By:
spencer be good with the chat
|
|
By:
that will get thrown out
|
|
By:
should go delta imo but Spencer is useless
|
|
By:
correct tom.
take your abridged version down  |
|
By:
looks like the winner kept it?
|
|
By:
yep
|
|
By:
can't find the rewind button
|
|
By:
 not sure ive ever seen a result overturned, stewards inquires pointless |
|
By:
was a f ag paper though coop
|
|
By:
RUK give us the head on AFTERWARDS
|
|
By:
rachel stfu
|
|
By:
comical eh - between that and leicester - we get the horses going down at hamilton for 8 mins and listening to the 2 gob****s on track
|
|
By:
who the feck is that woman on ruk,,shes speechless ,, sack her ,,
|
|
By:
Rachel,s absolutely speechless,we foooking wish
|
|
By:
i know wicklow unreal. we got the hamilton time before the leicester result. they are so inflexible
|
|
By:
shes saying jamie had his whip in his right hand so his horse came over
|
|
By:
RUK show us the head-on after the result of the enquiry.
|
|
By:
Because she's wrong she now has to be seen to be speechless. Derisory
|
|
By:
Sorry Fear, I didn't see your post.
|
|
By:
np
|
|
By:
I wonder whos calling the shots at ruk with these photo finishes where we aint seeing the still on the line until well after the beating is open and balanced - and these stewies where we dont see the heads on or replays.
|
|
By:
Had Faro Angel had an unimpeded run to the line ,there is little doubt that it would have won,I am speechless that Rachel was speechless.
I backed Faro in the photo ,at the admittedly bad price of 1.25 ,but was sure that there would be an inquiry.Then ,having rewound the race,backed the 2nd at between 2.5 and 3.1. .When the price seemed to leap from the shorter to the bigger price I wondered if somebody was playing with a marked card,but the price contracted again,back to around 2.5..Glad to see stewards being much more proactive,compared to the last 20 years ,when too many offenders were able to keep the race. |
|
By:
This may have been posted in one of the other 25 threads on the matter but....
The still posted on the BHA website is a lot different to the one shown on RUK https://www.britishhorseracing.com/racing/results/fixture-results/result/#!/2018/1014/3936/1/ https://twitter.com/racing_uk/status/1044228958898851840 |
|
By:
I should've pointed out you have to click on "Photo Finish" at the top right of the page on the BHA site.
|
|
By:
yes blunder
|
|
By:
Never noticed this won
|
|
By:
a fine advert for hunting the inbreds and getting pro stewards, that was shocking (nap)
|
|
By:
In the past 10 years we must have seen thousands of times where this sort of thing (horses drifting across the course) has happened, without a
Stewards' being called ,never mind a DQ. The mind boggles at the ineptitude of those responsible for running our sport. |
|
By:
that's the photo for 3rd and 4th shirley
|
|
By:
What PHOTO-FINISH Print is THAT?
It says 2:50 Kegworth Novice Stakes - BUT ... The PHOTO shows Number 1 (ONE) as the Winner - in LIGHT colours - EXTREME STATUS ... When the PHOTO was meant to show the Disqualified Number [b]7 - in Hamdams (dark) BLUE. |
|
By:
unbelievable decision, how stupid and unknowledgeable do you need to be to come to that decision
|
|
By:
rachel's been an embarrassment here.
the only thing i dont like is spencer, oisin and some others would be very good at the chat in the stewards. |
|
By:
Unbelievable to change that.
|
|
By:
it was a nose, there's nth wrong with the decision. When it's that short a dist youre always in danger.
rachel clueless |
|
By:
Rachel has a good point,Fear. How do the stewards DQ the horse without giving days to the jockey when they've based their decision on the
'sustained' drifting of the horse without the jockey making an effort to correct? |
|
By:
Rachel says ,to paraphrase 'In British racing you have to be certain the 2nd would have won'. WRONG ,nowhere in the Rules of Racing
does it state this ,or anything like it.If you infer your own rules differently to the actual rules ,no wonder you will be amazed by certain decisions. |
|
By:
yeah it's all about the distance. When these ones that have mullered other horse/s keep it is because they have hosed up by a bigger margin.
|