There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
13 Sep 18
21:58
Joined:
Date Joined:
23 Jun 11
higher rpr than enable
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 22
|
By:
rpr are made up figs
hth |
|
By:
How could any rating outlet place Lah Ti Dar above Enable, it's simply ridiculus
BHA Enable 128 Lah Ti Dar 115 |
|
By:
deadbrain mixng apples and bananas
|
|
By:
i hope they meet
|
|
By:
doubt that is true deadbrain............think you are living up to your name
|
|
By:
higher rpr after first three runs he means
|
|
By:
higher rpr after first three runs he means
|
|
By:
blame rp, its there in black and white.
|
|
By:
"higher rpr after first three runs he means"
Not sure about that. I think he's been fooled by the race-adjusted RPR showing on tomorrow's St Leger Racecard, where Lah Ti Dar has a race-adjusted RPR of 133, which is higher than the lifetime best RPR of 129 allocated to Enable. Lah Ti Dar has a lifetime best RPR of 117, against Enable's lifetime best RPR of 129, which is the only true RPR comparison that can be made between the 2 horses. The race-adjusted Ratings are specific to the Race in question, and no attempt should be made to relate them to the lifetime RPR of other horses. |
|
By:
the fact it runs in the leger tells you how good enable is..
|
|
By:
got silly now.
 |
|
By:
deadbrain......got silly now.......think you will find you started it
|
|
By:
ring racing post
 |
|
By:
William hill rp spreadsheet ,lah ti dah 133RATED BLACK SPOT WITH UPWARD ARROW.
 |
|
By:
Base rating equates to 10 st
Lah Ti Dar in Leger carries 8st 12lbs Diff between 10st and 8st 12 is 16 lbs. Base rating for Lah Ti Dar is 117. 117 plus 16 equals 133. If Enable was in this race with 8-12, her RPR on the racecard would be 145. |
|
By:
On that rating of 133, surely Lah Ti Dar should be a fair bet
|
|
By:
mystic anorack
|
|
By:
walk in to bookies arc day spreadsheet will give enable top 141the black spot
 |
|
By:
https://twitter.com/racing_uk/status/1032651751223119874
|
|
By:
what is the william hill rp spreadsheet with the upward arrow ?
|
|
By:
kew gardens=117,but the big question is could a horse go back in time if it travelled faster than the speed of light?.
  |
|
By:
Hopefully it hasnt ruined her
 |